Rumour is that Swann has been left out.

**Hillary** · 08-02-2012, 09:27 AM

**Hillary** · 08-02-2012, 09:29 AM

**PSRB** · 08-02-2012, 09:33 AM

**Hillary** · 08-02-2012, 09:34 AM

**Luis Anaconda** · 08-02-2012, 09:35 AM

unless it is a **** pitch we should have batted

**Hillary** · 08-02-2012, 09:59 AM

Maybe even promoted Prior to 6 and had them both - but we certainly wouldn't do that.

Don't like not having a spinner. If Swann is unfit, call up Panesar.

**Luis Anaconda** · 08-02-2012, 10:09 AM

I've banged on enough about Prior at 6 so no comment on that. Looking forward to Taylor batting though - the boy is utter class. Slips are a problem as well. No genuine 2nd slip in the side (though apparently at Warwickshire Trott is considered the best slipper by some distance). Arse - we've got our England back

**Hillary** · 08-02-2012, 10:10 AM

**Luis Anaconda** · 08-02-2012, 10:11 AM

should have had 500+ first innings and then it is a different ball game

**PSRB** · 08-02-2012, 10:16 AM

Thread: Rumour is that Swann has been left out.

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Rumour is that Swann has been left out.

He has - Finn plays instead.

Elbow injury must be worse than thought

According to Strauss it's based on the pitch, not Swann's fitness. But you're probably right.

Not happy with either decision tbh

Smacks of panic, doesn't it? I'd have picked Finn for Bresnan but kept Swann.

If it is protecting the injury get Panesar in ffs

One bad test in the field (on a belter of a pitch against quality batters) and we've over-reacted.

and the batsmen failed more than the bowlers

Stupid KP

Posting Permissions