Hmmmmm. I'm a bit worried about you sullying decent Christian women with your foul Levite seed, tbh
What of our pure, Nordic bloodlines, hmmm? They're b*ggered. That's what.
No offence, like.
You cant call a trial off just because it's long
And I was bloody right about Hutton, I dont mean to go on, of course.
Yes you can. They do it with fraud trials all the time.
Everyone gets bored and confused, so they pack it in. Sensible imo.
And it's Judicial Review, ffs! That's always a way of kicking the can up the road until nobody gives a sh*t anymore.
That's mostly because the SFO are so bad
Or you can tell him to stop believing the Roman propaganda and point out that
crucifixion was a Roman punishment, that he is naive to believe a made-up book like the bible (which the Romans heavily edited), and that the Romans persecuted the Jews at the time, drove them from their land which they renamed Palestine, and saw to it via their extended, Vatican-run empire that they were persecuted for another two thousand years. Bloody Romans. :rolleyes:
Pfffffffft. You've clearly drunk the Zionist Kool-Aid, a.
My eyes are open, dude!
And anyway, it was Caiaphas and his Sanhedrin who brought charges against and prosecuted JC. The Romans (as the governing power) simply (and, in the case of Pontius Pilate reluctantly) followed the ruling of the partially autonomous civil/religious authorities. You can't pin this one on Rome with your anti-Papist agenda.
Besides, the people who wrote the Bible, the great missionary Paul and the first Pope were Jews themselves.
Big question of how much of the original bible remained after the vulgate though
You can take the boy out of the Church
but you can't take the priest out of the boy.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, though, is it?
I could contend that they took out bits where the Jews gang-raped the BVM, j. That doesn't mean it's true.