Nice to know Rebekah Brooks went through the trauma of failed IVF
Only shame is that her infertility wasn't down to ovarian cancer, the amoral ****.
Has anybody pointed out that it's a bit late for the "look, i AM human" angle?
Still, she's already been let off one charge, I can see a clean sweep acquittal here.
Looks like Tony's advice was decent after all.
Also, I seem to remember everyone telling me I was a paranoid conspiracy theorist when I said Hutton was a kangaroo inquiry with a pre-determined result.
Once more, Jorge has the last laugh :vsign:
Occasionally humanity conjures individuals so despicable such
words are justified.
Her, not me :-|
good work mont..back yo your proper old skool insults..far better imo
I would have thought she's been shown to be all too human
Let's be honest: does anyone really give a toss? Really?
Ultimately, this thing has been hijacked by party politics (as these things always are), which has only served to incline most people not to care. It was interesting for a bit, but that was two years ago. Everyone's bored now and it just looks like a witch hunt.
"Judge not lest ye be judged", m.
Of course, your lot did judge the chap who said that.
Then they nailed him to a cross and left him to die.
Bit off, that. :-(
I think the trial's been pretty interesting
Also, it does feel like a bit of the old journalistic world has been laid to rest with all of this. I dont really think it's party political though, apart from she's a close friend of the PM and Coulson was his Netto Alistair Campbell.
And the crimes were actually pretty f**king despicable, let's not forget that.
Given that the british public is currently consuming their tiny minds with people playing crown green bowls on an ice rink I hardly think what they are interested in should be any barometer of validity.
Also, it's been worth it to prove that the Hutton sham was just that
What more penance can I offer for "my lot" than ending my heebie lineage
by procreating with a gentile?
Exactly. So it's served its purpose, then.
People only want one witch hunt at a time, j. And we've had Jimmy Savile since then, so Yewtree's of far more interest.
And how you can claim it's not party political when Tom Watson has used it as a means to get vengeance on Murdoch for his beloved Gordon I don't know.
Hmmmmm. I'm a bit worried about you sullying decent Christian women with your foul Levite seed, tbh
What of our pure, Nordic bloodlines, hmmm? They're b*ggered. That's what.
No offence, like.
You cant call a trial off just because it's long
And I was bloody right about Hutton, I dont mean to go on, of course.
Yes you can. They do it with fraud trials all the time.
Everyone gets bored and confused, so they pack it in. Sensible imo.
And it's Judicial Review, ffs! That's always a way of kicking the can up the road until nobody gives a sh*t anymore.
That's mostly because the SFO are so bad
Or you can tell him to stop believing the Roman propaganda and point out that
crucifixion was a Roman punishment, that he is naive to believe a made-up book like the bible (which the Romans heavily edited), and that the Romans persecuted the Jews at the time, drove them from their land which they renamed Palestine, and saw to it via their extended, Vatican-run empire that they were persecuted for another two thousand years. Bloody Romans. :rolleyes:
Pfffffffft. You've clearly drunk the Zionist Kool-Aid, a.
My eyes are open, dude!
And anyway, it was Caiaphas and his Sanhedrin who brought charges against and prosecuted JC. The Romans (as the governing power) simply (and, in the case of Pontius Pilate reluctantly) followed the ruling of the partially autonomous civil/religious authorities. You can't pin this one on Rome with your anti-Papist agenda.
Besides, the people who wrote the Bible, the great missionary Paul and the first Pope were Jews themselves.
Big question of how much of the original bible remained after the vulgate though
You can take the boy out of the Church
but you can't take the priest out of the boy.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, though, is it?
I could contend that they took out bits where the Jews gang-raped the BVM, j. That doesn't mean it's true.
Well if he were a 'religious nutjob' as you put it, that would be fair enough.
Unfortunately for the Jews, however, he was the real deal - the Christ, the Son of God.
Whether you believe that or not is immaterial. To many, many generations it was unquestionable and unquestioned FACT. Just as it was that the Jews had him topped.
So, with hindsight, killing him was a somewhat unfortunate political decision. And the Jews would have every right to feel a touch aggrieved that they're still getting hammered for it were it not for the fact that they were the ones who came up with the whole 'The sins of the fathers shall be visited upon the sons' schtick.
You can't really be part of a religion that preaches that sort of mindless vengeance and then complain when people avenge the sins of your fathers upon you imo.
its all made up bollocks anyway J..dumb bunch of bible believing fools..all of them
I was referring to Caiaphas.
He may have had his motives for hatching this alleged plot, but all Jews get blamed.
Yes, but the mob could have saved Jesus and went for Barabbas instead.
Again, an error in retrospect you'd have to say.
I find it all a bit Mel Gibson tbh
