Come on, Gary.
There is bias, and then there is just outright *******s :-)
Printable View
Come on, Gary.
There is bias, and then there is just outright *******s :-)
What was the VAR rejection for not giving it? Once I'd seen a couple of replays, I was sure the ref was gonna be told to come to the screen and we were gonna get a pelanty. I've no idea how that's not given. Like Wenger, I don't really like the pen and red card double, but that was a professional foul to stop a blatant goal scoring opp.
Had it only been a yellow and we'd missed the pen, his cheating would have been rewarded.
But why was it not a pen according to VAR?
Basically, I assume everything a professional footballer does on a football pitch is intentional.
Remember Cesc accidentally cropping Graham Poll at Wembley? Yes, we are supposed to believe this Barcelona-born and bred Spanish international central midfield Parquimetre who provably has eyes in the back of his head simply did not know the referee, of all people, was there.
Uh-huh.
My guess.... they saw it, thought about it and thought it wasnt a clear and obvious error. But they hate saying that because what it actually says is that you think it is a foul. You think the ref made an error, just not a clear and obvious one.
So instead of saying that, they make up some bull**** to try and convince you it wasnt a foul. And slowly you lose respect for referees.
Not quite sure how Neville has a job.
he just makes lots of noises, ooooooooooohh and I hate it.
But it was a clear and obvious error, just like that lino who thought Gabby was offside when nicking Vik's goal but wasn't.
Not the lino's fault, it was tight and did look a bit iffy in real time.
You needed a slow-mo close up to see just how blatant it was.
Do you think the fact that if it was a foul, it would have to be a red scared them? Even if we miss the pen the Chavs aren't winning with ten.
Didn't want the game to be all about their decision.
Which would be strange cos they normally want to be the stars of the show.
It certainly wouldn't have been a red card. A yellow, probably.
Nobody can actually explain what constitutes a clear and obvious error. I think they felt that was a 'seen them given' rather than a 'nailed on'.
The fact that Gary Neville thought it was a penalty (or feared might actually be a better word) tells you something.