8 weeks old.
A lot worse than I expected.
How long before they stop peeing and shidding all over the floor.
Printable View
8 weeks old.
A lot worse than I expected.
How long before they stop peeing and shidding all over the floor.
You're a richer man for having a dog, f.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
Obviously not financially...
#moneypits
you have to train it, f.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
take it into the garden, when it does a piss/****e outdoors give it a treat and lots of fuss.
they're quick learners.
in the meantime, lots of training pads down. it'll already have a favourite pissing/****ting place, no doubt.
Cute.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
Not too long. Just be sure to offer plenty of praise whenever they do their business in the correct place; two months old is a good age and it should get the message quickly.
What's the story here? What dog? WHY dog? Breed? Sex?
seems to be using the pads now. I feel like taking a pee on one just to join in.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
That would be so good Pat, well done you. Here, have a treat...Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
Controversial opinion, but dogs are annoying.Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Most animals are tbh but then there?s plenty of humans that give them a run for their money.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
They far outweigh the negs with what they give tho?. Terrible grief when you lose them, mind. Think I preferred ours to the kids :-)
I don't like the neediness and the constant mournful looks. Much better off with a cat who ****ing hates you :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by 7sisters
There is that.. Cat?s have servants, while dogs have masters, as someone once said.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
People have stampeded for dogs since covid. Many think it?s fine to now fark off to work while leaving them in the house with the radio on for hours on end. See it all the time. They?re a pack animal and people forget that element.
The flip side are those people with an almost embilical attachment who become racked with guilt when leaving them. Dogs can prevent you from doing lots of things, if you don?t have a supportive network, they really can put a significant dent in your free time. They?re basically small children who never grow up :-)
I hope you don't turn into one of those people who constantly posts pics of their dog. Also why haven't you posted pics of your dog?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
I remember when we learnt about Pavlov's dogs at school. I thought it was all complete nonsense, a load of bull. Then the bell went and we all went and had lunch...
7s is right on this, p.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
People are far more annoying than dogs.
L’enfer, c’est les autres. and all that.
Oh, I never said people weren't ****ing annoying....:-)Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
Love that :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Maravilloso Marvo
Here is wisdom.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
I much prefer animals to people. Which is handy because I'm overwhelmed with the *******s.
I understand that our hero was getting 'a bit political' last night in Manchester. I'm sure you will have concerns about this :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
It’s hard to disagree with the view that Trump is a ****er, p. It’s not exactly a partisan position.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Cats, mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Puddle Paws saw us doing some gardening, watched how we were doing it and then dug this huge hole exactly the right depth and width for the little bedding plant flower.
He got our attention, went as if to sheet in it, and then stepped back, to tell us it wasn't for his sheet, cos he hadn't done one and hadn't then filled it in. So we planted a flower in it for him and it's perfectly placed in front of some shrub so it makes a living box for him to lie in catoflagued.
Animals are deffo nicer.
Some friends of mine walked out :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
. . . . . . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
It takes all sorts, H :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman
Agreed and yet they still dodged a bullet by not letting Kamala Harris win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
My objection to what The Boss is currently saying at his gigs is not so much about Trump himself. In that I agree, the guy is a ****ing pig and unfit for office.Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
But I don't buy the idea of the USA being this shining beacon of hope, liberty and justice for 250 years, and certainly not from a man who has made a very good living in the last 50 of those years by writing about the difference between that myth and the American reality.
While he was recording Born To Run, Richard Nixon was disgracing the Office and dragging the US Presidency through its darkest hours of deceit and corruption. So I am afraid I can't agree that Trump has corrupted a great and unsullied institution.
More the latest in a long line of arrogant, self aggrandising dickheads who put themselves before the Office.
I've never, ever, been to a gig and thought "I hope to hear some political ramblimgs" from the artist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Play your music and **** off imo.
There is also that :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
English Bulldog, she wanted one and I didn't, female. 9 weeks oldQuote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Happy wife, happy life, f.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
You knows it.
glwtp, imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
Sadly departed BiL had one, ****ing nightmare. Virtually untrainable and can knock an adult flying if you get in the way of one having a zoomie.
Sadly departed BiL?Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
. . . . . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Nixon only resigned so that his vice president could pardon him. He did it to keep himself out of nick.Quote:
Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman
. . . . . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Wife's older brother, died during 2nd lockdownQuote:
Originally Posted by WES
He shouldn't have walked, he wouldn't have needed a pardon but it was different times. The whole sorry business was clearly a huge embarrassment; unforgivable incompetence basically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
A president is absolutely immune from criminal prosecution for conduct within their "exclusive sphere of constitutional authority," which includes running the intelligence agencies. Their supreme court agreed with this just last year.
Pretty sure the constitution of the US of A does not allow the president to approve the bugging of the offices of his competitors.Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Message reported to G Gordon Liddy
He should have walked, and he shouldn't have been pardoned. For his actions prior to the election in 68 he should have been tried for treason. The guy was unbelievable.Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Yeah, it does. National Security, innit.Quote:
Originally Posted by WES
Mind you, you can blame National Security for anything nowadays, as the man said.
Only when done under the auspices of National Security and through the appropriate channels. It doesn't permit the President's re election campaign officials to hire a bunch of second rate gas meter thieves to break in and then lie about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Nixon committed a number of significant criminal offences. Without that pardon, he was in big trouble.
No. A president doesn't need permission, the office of president is the permission, he is the appropriate channels! As the nation's chief law enforcement officer, all law enforcement reports to him. And if anybody doesn't like it they can impeach him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Essentially the pardon, following his resignation, was to bring an end to the national disaster and allow everyone to move on; at that point, his opponents had got their man. No need to rub it in further.