win the title :hehe:
"What was a drama is now a crisis for a Man City team looking their age"
What a silly Billy.
Printable View
win the title :hehe:
"What was a drama is now a crisis for a Man City team looking their age"
What a silly Billy.
Yeah, I thought he was good. We were too open in the first half and a bit exposed to counter attacks but that was largely due to having Jorginho at the base of midfield. Not his fault, but he isn't the quickest. Partey coming on solved the problem.
Merino is a bit of an animal, in a good way. And a real asset at set pieces. I think he will keep getting better as he understands the role.
The only other thing I would add is that the referee was a ****ing idiot and I was glad there were no major incidents for him to **** up.
I think Rice has looked ****ed since the latter stages of the Euros. Desperately needs a break so I wouldn't mind if he sits out for a couple of weeks. He isn't a natural fit in that more advanced role alongside Partey and I don't think he has adjusted too well so far this season. He will slot back in to his usual role once Partey gets injured.....
I like him too. I know TP5 is starting to get back to his best, but I really want to see Dec-MnM-?din in MF.
We saw how ?din and Saka linked up on Sat, and JT was beginning to get into working the overlaps and decoy runs with them so hopefully he can fill in for Benny Blanc.
MnM and ?din seem to understand each other from Spain.
We did see the fluidity with JT popping up on the left and Leo on the right wing with Saka.
But if Cala and MnM can learn to work with Gabby M like the right wing axis* works, then hopefully we can have it down both sides.
And if Dec drives forward into that inside left role {where he was great last season once Kai moved up front} MnM can drop to cover him.
*If, when chasing a winner, Kai drops back to inside left so Leo or Jeez plays up top, then Cala and Kai would be a right-wing axis but playing on the left. Just don't mention the war.
I thought that. Of course a player should be able to try to control a ball just over waist height with his foot. The opponent then deliberately tried to get his head down towards the foot {when that isn't a natural height to head the ball}, didn't make contact with either ball or B's foot and went down clutching his face as though he'd been kicked in the head.
Should have been booked for simulation.
Are we gonna say that no player can try an overhead kick in case a defender then tries to head it, misses, but claims to have been kicked? Or where when, with back to goal, a player kicks the ball over his own head and turns to run onto it?
And to show I'm being fair one of NF's yellows was a joke.
Our lad was trying to hoof the ball down the line. Of course the NF player should try to block it. The ball got hoofed over his foot and then or lad hit the NF player's foot on the follow through.
How is that a yellow?
Yeah, that one. Even I would have been angry if he'd got a red for knocking the ball away. Yates is a ****.
Ref got a lot of little things wrong. Gave us a corner after a shot from Saka- as far as I could see the ball was nowhere near out and he couldn't have had a view of it.
As I read somewhere, these VAR lines have totally obliterated the law where a player is onside if level. There is now no level, you're either on or off my a millimetre.
There should be some sort of umpire's call with the benefit going to the attacking side. Would make games more interesting with more goals and less time while VAR make themselves the centre of attention.
If the attacker's foot is slightly behind the defender, but his knee or forehead slightly in front, then that's level as far as I'm concerned.
I hate PGMOL. Ruining the game while screaming look at me, I'm the star of the show.
Exactly what I was thinking during the game. Raising their flag at the end of the move is basically just a free guess. Makes no difference whatsoever to the outcome. They are only really there for throw ins, corners, and to back up a ref if he is bottling a decision.
The chance Trossard missed was an interesting one. Flag went up at the end but I dont think it was for Trossard. I think Jesus was offside behind him and then joined play after the keeper saved it. So Trossard was onside when he fluffed it.
Clear and obvious error is football's umpire's call. It just isn't used for offside. The issue with giving decisions that are invisible to the naked eye is that it is impossible for players to tell that their shoelace is offside. The rule slowly starts to look a bit daft....