Whatever happens today 😀
Printable View
Whatever happens today 😀
I agree, as long as we don't score too many. Let's start with 2.5 per game and see how we get on.
Arteta was furious about the goal we conceded. I watched it again- have to say I am not sure we did that much wrong. Could have closed the gap a bit quicker but that isn't the biggest error in the world.
Arteta was not overly subtle on that point :-)
They both came off injured. 100% they should pull out. Both are desperately in need of a rest, despite being two of the most resilient players around. And I will be angry if Odegaard goes anywhere other than the pub for the next two weeks.
We mustn't allow our emotions to run away with us. 2½ goals per match is simply asking for folk to get excited and begin imagining a world in which we should not buy another striker.
Two is sufficient, assuming our assistant coach in charge of clean sheets returns from injury (or Bahrain?) soon.
I suspect it was timing that upset the manager. Schoolboy stuff :-\
We've gone into the last 20 minutes of matches against City, Chelsea and Liverpool a goal up. And haven't won any of them. Mitigating circumstances in all three to some extent but even so.... annoying.
I do shudder every time I see 'pundits' and other assorted arseholes whine on and on about who we should have signed and when without any context, most particularly how much these assorted fanny dancers and goal-shy layabouts would have actually cost. We are not made of money and like most of the league we are bound by a set of rules about spending.
That said, I wonder if Arteta is beginning to wonder whether he might have been better off keeping Reiss Nelson than bringing in Sterling. I guess he isnt setting the world alight in training so far :-(
Money has ruined the game. One or two more goals each from Eddie and Jesus and we're champions. And when the alternative was one hundred million British pounds worth of, as you say, goal-shy fanny dancing gambling addicts ("layabouts" is harsh, I feel), you can see why we took that chance.
Sterling for Nelson is a little sad. Though young Raheem does add a little something, it doesn't appear to be helping so far and our squad has aged alot in three years. The manager may be losing patience with himself :-\
I understand the gamble, in the hope that if he comes good he is a special player that Arteta knows well. But I would have thought the experience of Willian would have put them off. Sterling looks slow and nowhere near the player he was, and that was always likely. You have to wonder whether his heart is in it.
I would have understand it more if we had been desperate but we could have kept Nelson. He is at least hungry, loves the club and has had decent games for us.
Nelson isn?t exactly pulling up trees at Fulham tbf. He?s replicating what he did for us.I think he anticipated more starts, although he did get one last time out, only to get pulled in the second half.
The issue is more that Sterling is a busted flush, the warning signs were already there but the deal, and perhaps Arteta?s ego, wanted to see if an Indian summer was a possibility.
Mudryk would have been the better loan but I doubt that was ever an option.
Think you've jumped the gun on Sterling very early there 7. He's come into a tight unit with no pre-season - let's see what impact he has later on in the season. To have such an experienced player as back up to Saka and Martinelli is surely a plus. Seem to remember you crying out for such experience back in the Wenger days
I think we all know what arteta hoped he could get out of him. And that he hasn't seen it yet.
It's all down to sterling himself. He is a fine player, comfortably good enough to provide a real threat for us if he can get himself properly fit and focused.
We have to wait and see if he has another season in him. Or has he just had enough and all we've done is replaced Willian.
I agree it is to early to judge. But if he isn't contributing by Christmas then it hasn't really been worth the gamble.