What is the insinuation? That white male Tory voters should, by default, not be included in conversations about diversity? I'm confused.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...rsity-watchdog
Printable View
What is the insinuation? That white male Tory voters should, by default, not be included in conversations about diversity? I'm confused.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...rsity-watchdog
Well yes, it's rather more than an insinuation, isn't it? The rage is clear to see. The odd thing is that, if it is true that "the BBC’s diversity and inclusion group, ....has the task of ensuring the broadcaster is representative of modern Britain" then clearly it needs to contain a "Conservative-voting white male" since modern Britain has loads of the buggers. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
we should take the lead from https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...ntirely-by-menQuote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
I'm not going around wearing a sheet, i. I'll look silly.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
The fact that a member of the country's overwhelming predominant race who votes for the most popular single political party is treated by the BBC as some sort of fringe voice pretty much sums up the problem, I'd have thought.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
they are very white, though scQuote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Yes, basically. They've had their turn and it's time to let somebody, anybody else have a go.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
On the plus side, some sanity has broken outQuote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...iaaf-athletics
Is there an intimation in there that she sports a pair of clockweights, or did I imagine that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
Surely part of this whole thing should have involved everyone having a good shufti at her downstairs mix-up?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Is that not your first port of call in these matters?
This is one of the worst sentences I have ever had the misfortune to read. :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
Quote:
“While the evidence available so far has not established that those concerns negate the conclusion of prima facie proportionality, this may change in the future unless constant attention is paid to the fairness of how the Regulations are implemented”
Always reminds me of the joke about Fatima Whitbread where she goes to the doctor complaining that she's started to grow hair on her torso and he asks her where it finishes. To which she answers *Gruff voice* "Just above me bóllocks". :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Nobody seems to tell jokes anymore, do they? It's very sad.