and say this and STILL be allowed to teach children?
Putting one's political leanings to one side, is this not terribly, terribly sinister?
https://twitter.com/tomhfh/status/1044239128236298240
and say this and STILL be allowed to teach children?
Putting one's political leanings to one side, is this not terribly, terribly sinister?
https://twitter.com/tomhfh/status/1044239128236298240
I'd ask for my child to be moved from his class, actually the school.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I rather liked the lady yesterday who had the audacity to point out that Labour MP's had a duty to represent their constituency not just Labour members......it didn't really go down well.
It seems to be based on the notion that one has to be thick to be a Tory- at least, thick in the educational sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I wonder what an analysis of voting behaviour crossed with qualification level would reveal......
Fúck it, lets also preach the value of eugenics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
These people are fúcking dangerous
:hehe: Well it would probably show that people who hang around lefty educational establishments for longer tend to be more left-wing than those who grow up and get proper jobs instead.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
It's rather pathetic more than anything, but yes shouldn't be allowed to teach. Unless he teaches geography - no one cares about themQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
he's a teaching assistant. not sure if that is good or bad. He's still got access to kids.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Still, it's only in Wales. There, they'd vote for a dog turd if it had a red rosette on it.
We didn't have those in my day. We just had a teacher. Aren't they the teaching equivalent of those pretendy, 'fake bacon' coppers?Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
Either that or they carry the books for the teacher...Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
probably as deep as mine was when I heard the spanish pénis eater Portillo* boasting to the swivel eyed faithful about how he was going after single mothers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
*I find the train thing he does now on telly unfathomably enjoyable which is odd given he is devoid of any kind of camera craft and simply trundles around the world simpering at everyone he meets like the lascivious old homo that he is.
Oh God, where do you dredge up this material? It's so weird, this obsession with "liberalism." I doubt you have the least idea what it means.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
This is from the stage of the Labour Party Conference.Quote:
Originally Posted by eastgermanautos
I know precisely what 'liberalism' is. It is a noble concept of individual freedom wrongly attributed to the political left and its persistent attempts to achieve the polar opposite.
And what is certainly not liberal is the desire to politically indoctrinate children.
and when did everything you disagree with become 'evil'?Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
whackjobs.
He didn't say evil, he said sinister......and it is, kids need to have a rounded view on the world and make decisions based on the full picture, not be ****ing brain-washed.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
Demonisation of the opposition is the tried and trusted tactic of all extremists. If you can categorise your opponents as not merely wrong, but actually evil, you can morally justify pretty much any action against them.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
The ***** mentioned something about not ever meeting an evil 4 year old and then talked some *******s and then mentioned there would be no Tories in his dystopian world..?Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
Oh you mean the Welsh teacher, not B??Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
tbf, I rarely refer to b as a *****. ;-)Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
Oh, you might as well, i. Everyone else does. :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
I'd say it's affectionate when your mum does it. Your dad, not so much. There's real venom there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Ironically it is the americans that have no real idea what the word means and have appropriated it to anything that looks like big government or left leaning pandering. Very far removed from the classical liberal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Sociologists now employ the term 'modern liberal' to describe centre left individuals who cannot be described as socialists. But then they would, because they are ****s.
Yes, in the 19th century began a conflation of liberal thought -- as characterized by enthusiasm for Enlightenment concepts -- with the emergence of the middle class. This conflation was not an accident: the middle class sought to bedeck itself in principled lofty garb, in part to achieve its ends. The Revolution of 1848 is one such manifestation. Because of the only-moderate success of that revolutionary event, a natural splintering occurred. The middle class grew tired of certain lofty concepts, and others, artists, members of marginalized groups, took upon themselves the mantle of liberal beliefs. You point up some particular segment of these artists or marginalized groups, this guy up on stage. I hardly listened to the clip. But I would not describe these splintered elements as "illiberal," merely as a product of a long history.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
But when I come on here, there seems to be a long harangue against these groups, a harangue in favor of Brexit, which may express the mood of the middle class. I don't know that you can say these middle class moods are liberal necessarily. Basically -- I don't insult you by saying that you're middle class. But you may have sympathy for said class -- your point of you represents a churlish hodge-podge, a kind of scabrous carping. I for one do not approve.
For me, Britain should step forward and reinvade India. End of story.
Your idea of liberalism seems to include membership of the EU - which is a profoundly illiberal organisation dedicated to protectionism, state regulation and technocratic and bureaucratic supremacy over the demos. My issue with you is that you appear to think the EU is something it is not and predicate your arguments about Brexit on that palpably false premise.Quote:
Originally Posted by eastgermanautos
So for instance, today the EU Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality called for the EU to be allowed to regulate the press on the grounds that she (a woman who grew up in Communist Czechoslovakia) thinks the oldest free press on earth dares to say nasty things about EU Commissioners and leaders, which 'sows division' (rather the point of a pluralist society, I'd have thought) and ought to be stopped.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...u-commissioner
Which bit of 'liberal' would you say state regulation of a free press comes under?
Well, I guess in Eastern Europe things are going a bit too far. Poland, Hungary. First they initiated a bunch of measures to combat the influx of refugees, immigrants. No problem with that, I can see their point. But they push on further to try to dissolve elements of the government, such as independence of the courts, et cetera. It will always be a bit tricky with countries which were not democratic, had democracy imposed on them, and whose people now are having second thoughts about that imposition. Various decisions must be taken about whether these countries can simply pull down the whole democratic system that the EU had instituted. And whether, if they attempt to do so, they cannot be punished for such an attempt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I thought -- and please tell me if I'm wrong -- that the EU was established to promote the freer flow of trade between the European member countries. Free trade and the material benefits of it is a liberal goal par excellence.
Eastern Europe is to the right of western Europe (both literally and metaphorically), but the EU's problem is that it really is in no position to lecture anyone about democracy since it is in no meaningful sense democratic itself. The idea that the EU has instituted any democratic system is - frankly - laughable. Equally, we have to ask by what authority it takes it upon itself to censure democratically elected national governments for the laws they - with a public mandate - choose to enact over their own countries?Quote:
Originally Posted by eastgermanautos
And the Common Market was set up to facilitate internal trade, but that doesn't stop it being protectionist. First and foremost it was established to provide a protected market for German manufactured goods and French agricultural produce. Prices are kept artificially high by quotas, tariffs on imports and by paying farmers not to produce and forcing fishermen to throw dead fish back into the sea. It is not free trade in any meaningful sense.
Let us not forget EU intervention into farming and manufacturing which would allow farmers, packers and producers to continue to produce stuff the market didn't need and give them a guaranteed price for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Who doesn't need a butter mountain?
Though selling intervention stocks of meat off as halal and a greatly inflated prices to the Allans shirley takes the biscuit?