He appears to be an annoying ****.
I don't really care if he leaves.
Printable View
He appears to be an annoying ****.
I don't really care if he leaves.
me neither. the narcissistic ****.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
+1
I would very happily sell him for the oft mentioned £50mil, provided we spent it and spent it well.
We won't though :-|
Would you sell him to City?Quote:
Originally Posted by World's End Stella
FTR I would if they were the highest bidder. Can't be bothered with all this not selling to a rival nonsense.
Im pretty sure we can get 5th without him also
I do wonder why The Arsenal seem to find transfers so troubling. Anyway, last season was the catalyst for change so I assume that things will change this summer. Window opens tomorrow :annoucembappe:Quote:
Originally Posted by World's End Stella
Apart from the fact that he's an egomaniac who has a negative influence on the team, he does nothing better than Walcott anyway. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
:nod: Welcome to Arsenal, Sergio.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
:hehe: redg will be Having Words when he sees this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Nah, take the £55m and reinvest in players of our choice, not those offered in some kind of footballing equivalent of Noel Edmonds noncery.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich
Anyway, swaps don’t really happen do they? Clive Allen and all that.
Yup :nod:Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Mostly because I think watching him give the ball away would drive Pep mental and he'd barely get a game as a result. Not that I believe the City rumours, of course. They already have Gabriel, De Bruyne, Sane and Sterling as well as Aguero and Silva (cracking player). Just can't see him being a target but who knows :shrug:
Sané, on the basis of last season perhaps the most exciting of all.Quote:
Originally Posted by World's End Stella
As I told you about two years ago - you're welcomeQuote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Let's assume the rumours are true that he ditches Aguero. I would think that Sane, Gabriel and De Bruyne are first choice. Silva and Silva can play there as well. He needs Sachez for 50mil?Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
I think not.
Bring back Baptista imoQuote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
That didn't really work for us at all. Not only did we lose Reyes we then also lost Baptista.
Quote:
Originally Posted by World's End Stella
I am not sure the concept of “need” is really that important in the annual Man City program of recruitment and team strengthening.
One could argue they are overloaded with attacking talent, the best in the league I would say. They finished last season desperately in need of defensive reinforcement and indeed replacements, so the first thing they do is purchase Bernardo Silva. Of course I expect they will address the defence at some point.
Guardiola will simply not countenance another season of failure like last and if Sanchez can improve his options then the spending of 50m is neither here nor there.
If City don’t want him then the entire media would appear to have this whole story dramatically wrong.
City's needs should not matter a fig on Sanchez's valuation. I say he is worth at least £70 million and whilst I wouldn;t sell him to a direct rival if they offer Aguero and £20 million I might listen.
I would have taken Bernardo Silva in a heartbeat. He was brilliant in the Monaco games I watched.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
I said the same and had my eye on Dembele (Dortmund won) and Sane last summer. We could afford them, they were available.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
But they would have killed Ox and Walcott, I suppose. :-|
Thing is, since the invincibles we have had precious few genuinely top-drawer players. Fabregas and Van Persie stood out among the mediocrity and when each of them left we pretty much said "good riddance", kidded ourselves that they were more trouble than they were worth and that we would be stronger without them. Were we *******s.
Sanchez is even more world-class, and despite his tantrums has stood out in terms of attitude and application as well as ability. While I get that 50 million would be hard to resist, who do you trust Wenger to replace him with who would make us stronger? By all means argue that we can't afford to let him run down his contract, but don't kid yourself we are better without him, especially if he goes to Chelsea or City.
There's also no guarantee that he'd have the same impact at a club with far better players than at our place.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Not really true though dude. Cech, Ozil, Bellerin, Koscielny, Ozil, Mustafi maybe. That's a solid number. The real weakness is in Walcott and Ox, who haven't ever really gotten over the hump. Giroud is a good second option and therefore does not influence the argument one way or another.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yesterday Once More
Oh and Coquelin of course. Nice piece but that's all he is. I like Xhaka.Quote:
Originally Posted by eastgermanautos
Don't listen to these people, AS7; bunch of mummy's boys who just want to weep into her bosom whenever a real man makes his presence felt. Barely a fully-functioning cock amongst them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Man are jokers :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by World's End Stella
I mean apart from his tremendous performances in the semi and the final and his key goals in both, and his 30 odd other goals (and his 10-15 assists, I'm not going to bother googling it), he is a real detriment to the teamQuote:
Originally Posted by Sir C