https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/3edb5...627b00b1489d70
Printable View
I would be expecting something more along these lines...
http://empireonline.media/jpg/50/0/0...Barbarella.jpg
I call bull****.
My, hasnt she grown up into a lovely strapping lad?
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/...k_2499024k.jpg
I mean, they was supposed to be a lesbian, but, given that they has a child, they clearly stopped being a lesbian for a little while, at least. Now they can't be a lesbian because they isn't a woman.
They ought to make their bleeding mind up.
that I have no idea who this person is.
Who are they?
Because if she thinks those are large and unwieldy, God knows how she defined Allegra McKevedy's.
http://www.chrisjepson.com/stonewall...dy_CJP5424.jpg
So essentially a fraud unless the award was related to being a freak.
I'm a little behind the curve on all this cutting-edge gender theory.
The databases I look after have two genders and until I am ordered to do otherwise, that is how it will stay.
With the emphasis on 'anal', obvs.
A gender heat map, maybe?
Born as 1, sometimes feels like one, sometimes feels like the other. Likes to be called they as calling them him or her would both offend and perhaps confuse them.
In summary, a wrong 'un.
One notch up from a Protestant.
I blame the Oxbridge lot - everyone I know who comes out of there starts blabbering on about "narrow cisgender perspective" and tuts at me for saying something looks/sounds/is generally "a bit gay".
:-(
What you describe is genderfluid or genderqueer.
I'm starting to have my suspicions, personally.
I reckon you're a little bit Grayson, nttawwtsot of course
We have a television (or radio) presenter that is gender fluid.
Modern Ireland eh. f**k me.
If they associate with neither then what are they, and please do not say non-binary. I won't accept that as an answer.
Which loo would they go to in a pub?
They are f**king mentals, is what they are.
Or if we keep our eyes shut.
Let's have a massive AWIMB lez up!
We'll invite Jack to give us a good, hard shag.
if that it what is required to express their fluidity. Obviously some will find the restriction to a mere three dimensions to be an oppressively narrow perspective and will drive the push to expand the paradigm.
disheartneing
I think that says more about your technique than anything else :shrug:
Gender needs to be defined in x, y and z co-ordinates