I don't understand Kate Upton. She's posed in revealing bikini's for mens magazines and happily

taken money for it and now she's getting all morally uppity about people looking at grainy pictures of her.

pathetic, grubby little voyeuristic onanist hunched over his laptop with his sad little cock in his sad little hand who derives some misplaced sense of gratification from getting to see (and **** over) pictures he was never meant to see.

Link?

too busy "looking" at those pics of Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence..

:rubchin:

grubby little voyeuristic [chaps]" then you're kind of opening up the door to your boudoir in the first place, so you'd better be really bloody careful what's in there.

herself taken under very controlled circumstances thereby gives up her right to any sort of privacy and has no business complaining when some vile little freak steals private images of her for all the other vile little freaks out there to work themselves up into a lather about?

What an odd moral universe you inhabit. Presumably you also feel it's OK to rape porn actresses?

as she makes her living posing mostly naked for the camera and is then seemingly appalled that when some naked pictures of herself (that she willingly posed for) appear online people want to look at them.

I realise that your MO is to be aloof and argumentative, but the direction you take things to try and make a point is sometimes pretty low.

If someone sells something for a living, that does not make it OK to steal that thing on the grounds that they have already established the principle of commoditising and disseminating that thing. If anything, it makes it less OK, surely?

To make a less contentious analogy, if I sell foodstuffs, that doesn't make it OK for you to come into my home and steal my dinner.

surely what marks out decent from indecent people.

Or even merely making mischief.