10 years. Whether or not the storm was quite as ferocious as suggested, the fact is that it existed and they were forecasting its arrival 5 days ago. That's some seriously clever computer modelling of an incredibly complicated process.
Printable View
10 years. Whether or not the storm was quite as ferocious as suggested, the fact is that it existed and they were forecasting its arrival 5 days ago. That's some seriously clever computer modelling of an incredibly complicated process.
accurate climate models one day!
You know, the 60-80 mph winds. As predicted. With the occasional 90 mph gust. As they predicted? That storm, do you mean?
Office.
No trains running either which is nice :-)
The 'Green' (Red) conspiracy is too strong, a.
Surely a company like Group 4 could do this for cheaper (the fact I'm on the board of G4 and they couldnt do it cheaper is neither here or there)
Plus it's tasked with achieving a profit so has to behave as a commercial enterprise.
wd mo.
They are a drain on our stretched resources, we need to farm them out at a huge, but crucially off balance sheet, cost.
Did thatcher die for nothing?
capable of performing 100 trillion calculations per second what did it. Outsource the lot of them to India with a copy of "Supercomputers for Dummies" imo
They make a profit every year, as well :cloud9: Which means they're not a drain on our resources at all - in fact just the opposite.
You're a bit vague about how this money stuff works, aren't you j? I can talk you through it one day :thumbup:
:taxcutsforhighearners: :cloud9:
it was steady around 30 to 47 mph - which is just in force 6 to 7..just around atrong breeze to minor gale.. - with occasional gusts in 60 - 80- gale / storm force ( with max in certain areas 90odd) but big difference between steady 60 to 80 mph and gusts 60 to 80..it was a minor storm Sir C and the computers got over excited.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/weather/observations/heat hrow-greater-london#?tab=last24hours&fcTime=1382828400