I thought that cap was a tin-foil hat at first :hehe:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ying-prisoner/
Printable View
I thought that cap was a tin-foil hat at first :hehe:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ying-prisoner/
That’s what happens when you spend endless evenings on the marching powder with Danielle Westbrook I’m afraid..
Sadly, It’s probably too late for her to try C’s bugle cleaner..
That's the point though. I have been unable to establish what she wants (and I congratulate you for having done so) as I am unable to decipher her meaning through the shrill, hectoring paranoid nonsense she foghorns out every time she speaks.
If you look for a definition of 'indefatigable termagant' you will find her name together with a picture of Jess Philips.
Yeah, it's leeetle beeet of a shame that she's portrayed as such due to her theatrical performances in Parliament, when she infact holds a pretty moderate position (certainly compared with yer Adonises et al) and, as far as I know, has never called for Brexit to be scrapped or even for a second ref.
The one thing she does always say that annoys me is "no-one voted to be poorer", which is annoying as they demonstrably did.
No they didn't - they voted for a less certain short term future in the hope that the long term future would be better and more philosophically aligned with their views of how the country should be run.
Other than the old people who voted to keep out the *inevitable* onslaught of swarthy looking people into their bucolic villages, of course.
On the other hand, she was on Today this morning calling for a 'Government of National Unity', which would seem to me to be a gross betrayal of the Party and voters she purports to represent. Meanwhile, of course, the ERG - who are actually seeking to ensure the Government sticks to its manifesto pledges - are described as 'rebels'. Go figure.
That's pretty
essay-company.com provides quality writing help service at affordable cost in a wide range of subject areas for all grade levels, team of highly skilled and experienced assignment writer, plagiarism free work, 24x7 availability of customer support, guaranteed on time delivery.
I mentioned my parents' feelings as exemplifying the fact that there were many, many, many different reasons why people voted Remain. The specific purpose was to make clear that they were not symptomatic or emblematic of anyone else and that generalisations were idiotic.
Your anecdote, on the other hand, was explicitly about the only leave voter you knew and was meant to suggest that huge numbers of Leave voters were idiots who had no idea what they were doing. In fact, all it actually served to demonstrate was the narrow range of political opinion in your social circle. Echo chamber thinking, in other words.
You think Labour will back a deal rather than take the opportunity to bring down the government? Why? They haven't so far.
Equally, the ERG increasingly sees No Deal as the least worst option and it's looking like a deal isn't possible. Largely unnoticed the other day, the ERG slipped in an amendment to the Chequers Bill that effectively destroys the backstop clause for Northern Ireland, regarded as the guarantee there’ll be no hard border with the Republic. If that's the case, all bets are off. That would put in jeopardy the entire Withdrawal Agreement - which if it collapsed would mean a no-deal Brexit becomes virtually certain.
The ERG has only just started to flex its muscles, though. And it has the party membership behind them. May is now effectively their hostage.
Bear in mind also that Eurosceptics have been nurturing their grievances for decades and that theirs is an ideological position. They’re not going to back down just because they’re threatened with a GE by a PM they despise.
My point is that Soubry and her fellow remainers (including the entire global political and economic establishment) spent the entire campaign telling people that leaving would make them poorer.
Even if they didn't understand the precise reasons why, we can surely assume they understood the basic concept of leaving making them poorer.
So it seems odd for her to then come out and say "people didn't vote to be poorer" :shrug:
I said we dont want to be poorer.
I dont think that is what she meant. As I understood it she was talking about the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs. THat is a poorer society, not one with greater public spending arising from higher taxation. THey are very different things.
And yet. Despite being two years into this seesaw process, the markets continue to ignore the political process and those within it from all sides, by continuing along its merry way.
According to the Office of National Statistics (ONS) unemployment fell by 12,000 to 1.41 million in the quarter to May giving a jobless rate of just 4.2 per cent.
At the same time employment increased by 137,000 in the quarter to May to 32.4 million, the highest figure since records began in 1971, giving a record rate of 75.7 per cent.
Job vacancies increased by 7,000 to 824,000 - the most since records began in 2001.
Average earnings also increased by 2.5 per cent in the year to May, co
No one on either side really knows . The markets will always find their own way..