and are then described as "terrified" when their footage is used in subsequent news coverage...
Anyone who does such a thing is not "terrified". They are excited and thinking of how much attention it is going to get them on social media.
and are then described as "terrified" when their footage is used in subsequent news coverage...
Anyone who does such a thing is not "terrified". They are excited and thinking of how much attention it is going to get them on social media.
Anyone who films a situation when they could have been helping is generally a ****... very occasionally filimg MIGHT help the Police, but as you say, generally it is because they are attention grabbing
Social media has a lot to answer for
Why do mobile phone video's shown on TV have those stupid end pannels on????
I had a chap holding up his phone at the last gig I went to, right in front of me to the extent of becoming my sole focus. Now this wasn’t the one song, this was beginning to look like the fúcker was attempting to record the whole thing, or perhaps the first album as the gig was a live re-appraisal of the first two albums by the band.
I really don’t understand it.
Had to move in the end.
I simply refuse to believe this. I imagine it is something that has happened on occasion and the frequency has simply been exaggerated for the sake of a story.
Which self-respecting chap would send a lady a picture of the membrum virile? No, I simply refuse to believe it.
****s. I went on a three hour coach trip in Iceland to see the Northern Lights. When we finally found a patch of clear sky, everyone got out and pretty much all of them started setting up their cameras- ****ing tripods, buttons on leads, different lenses.
I swear to God I was the only person actually looking up at the sky.
It was pretty ****, by the way. Like looking at a pale green cloud.
Why do you feel the need to say these things, my son? Does it give you pleasure? Does the demon inside reward you with warm feelings when you utter these blasphemies? Does the torment stop for a moment?
For you I can prescribe two possible cures for your ailments:
1. An exorcism.
2. Death.
Choose wisely.
Stop being such a silly old fool.
The point is that the visual spectacle is deliberately reduced so as not to detract from the narrative. Hence there is pretty much no light show, a plain black backdrop and most of the band dress in black or a dark colour. It isn't like a Pink Floyd gig is it.
This is the show. It is there to be felt, listened to and experienced. It isn't something to gawp at and take endless photos.
Anyway, the camera on my phone is a bit ****.
Visually, that is what it is. Bruce is not Steve Tyler. He doesn't backflip round the stage, he doesn't prance like Mick Jagger. He puts everything into the voice.
It isn't something to film. I don't know why you have an issue with this.
I saw Weller on that Jools Holland special last week. Nice enough but hardly a camera moment.
For Springsteen fans it is an evening in church. These people are bloody fanatics, dangerous individuals.
Look at Sir C. You only have to point out that one song in particular is not that great and he loses his ****.
Quite frankly I am usually glad to get out of there alive.
My son pointed at his ball bag in the bath the other day and said "Daddy, what part of my willy is this?"
I told him it's where men keep the sperm to give to a woman so they can make a baby. I now fully expect him to be sent home from school at some point for claiming that only men produce sperm and only women can make babies :-(
I once photocopied my membum virile to see what it looked like from a different angle
I was impressed
If you kill Peter remember to film it on your mobile
It is the way of current discourse, I believe. Did you see Jacob R-M responding to a lefty telling him to 'fúck off and die'? 'If I do, would you pray for my immportal soul?' :hehe:
The man is like a saint, p. He is fit to lace Lord Willie's boots, and there aren't many who are.