of course. I have to bounce down there this week. Feel like I should bust a cap in a few kangaroos while I'm at it.
:-D
of course. I have to bounce down there this week. Feel like I should bust a cap in a few kangaroos while I'm at it.
:-D
You're taking the Mueller report pretty badly then, disappearing off to Australia? :-(
To cheer you up, here's some hounds going to breakfast.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pT...i=w104-h186-no
Ridicules, isn't it? Of course the meej, dems and spooks who have been banging the drum will in no way be held to account. Their careers will continue unharmed. After all, if John Bolton and Elliot Abrams can still get top jobs after what they've done in the past ... (yeah, I know they're your pals).
It's miles better than stating the fact. If he were, we would not wish to admit it. There is the possibility that he is and that we are simply refusing to acknowledge the fact. That the powers that be consider it too damaging to the nation.
In other words, that there are some rabbit holes one does not want to go down.
:hehe: So, when your conspiracy theory is fatally undermined, rather than accept you were wrong, you're choosing to double down and blame an even larger, more nebulous and all-encompassing conspiracy theory?
You realise it's a short step from there to aliens and lizard people, right? :hehe:
Understandable though, imo. For them, this is a death match. Politics, media, financial services, lobbying; you name it. They've all fallen into the FBI/Trump/Russia honey-trap and the evidence is all in.
Wouldn't be surprised to hear from this forgotten fellow soon ..
https://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/med...d8ef8b6ce837e3
Why would there be the need for contrition? The report makes it clear that the Russians did interfere in the election and while there was some superficial evidence to indicate that there may be ties to Trump, when it was investigated in more detail there was no evidence that a crime had been committed.
If governments weren't capable of this sort of investigation I'd be more concerned. :shrug:
Oi! Eastie! Watch my lips.
"THERE IS NO EVIDENCE!"
The DNC wasn't hacked, it was leaked. The file transfer times were too fast for an internet connection from eastern europe, and no-one was allowed to look at the server except Crowdstrike who have a Ukrainian nationalist agenda. The real election theft was Killary stealing the primaries from Sanders, who all polls say would have beaten Trump. The facebook ads of puppies from a clickbait farm in Leningrad had nothing to do with your election.
Now, I have an idea for a brilliant and original sci-fi / horror film. Who should I speak to?
Oh quite, and the fact that the beneficiary of their meddling is so reviled (possibly because he comes across as so utterly immoral) by the opposition that they couldn't let it lie, they couldn't pass up the chance that there might have actually been something there.
Sadly for them, the Donald is both immoral and street wise - this is precisely the sort of thing he can get away with.
This is rather good too, as it was Mueller who took down the original version, way back when.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2ecPM8VAAAxgKy.jpg:large
I've stolen it already, Ash. I stole it even before you woke up this morning ;-)
[More seriously, you can protect your idea by registering it with the Writers Guild of America. Or Writers Guilde of Ye Olde England, or whatever. And whatever the truth about people ripping of your sh!t, you have to get in there. No option. Kind of like that scene in Braveheart. Yeah, they were some tough basterds out there on the heath in their kilts. But at a certain point, one of them was like, you know what, we have to go in and fight the British fvcks. We have to go in there. Tho it meant their deaths!]