in terms that the victims appear to part of the LGBT community.
and it's Pride month.
Printable View
in terms that the victims appear to part of the LGBT community.
and it's Pride month.
FFS One minority at a time, p.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
I came to this conclusion just on the photographs of the blokes,Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Just unfortunate timing tbh, it's never gonna compete with BLM Pat, nothing can. Even Corona has been put on hold. And as for Brexit which was top of the news league for 2 solid years...Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
So in a way it’s positive for all of us. As I think as they had those protests the other week and didn’t really condemn the lockdown breaches as they couldn’t possibly dare to as they are to scared.Quote:
Originally Posted by barrybueno
I think it’s sped up the opening of pubs announcement later today.
Also if the death toll starts going up again they will change how they report it. There is no way we are going into lockdown again
I'm not surprised at all. Everyone else gets thrown under the bus if it's about not revealing that this was a blatantly homophobic attack by a muslim 'asylum seeker' on three obviously gay men.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
Even while they were still warm Stonewall could barely wait to get through the boilerplate condolences over the deaths of gay men before getting to the real threat: Islamophobic rhetoric.
Plus the perpetrator's family get more media airtime than those of the victims and we hear about how he was mentally ill, etc, etc.Quote:
Robbie de Santos, director of Stonewall, paid tribute to Furlong and Ritchie-Bennett. He said: “Our thoughts are with those affected by the attack in Reading on Saturday. It’s heartbreaking to hear two of the victims were LGBT.
“But we can’t let Islamophobic, racist and xenophobic rhetoric be used to divide us. We must stand together to make progress.”
But fly a banner saying 'White Lives Matter' behind an aeroplane and suddenly every media prick who's been mysteriously silent suddenly loses their shít. It's f@cking sickening.
recognised hangout for the bumders ( nothing wrong with bumders though b - some of my best friends and a' that)Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Put three gay men in close proximity and their gayness is going to stick out like a bulldog's b0llocks. This is simply an observable fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman
Is there a name for a group of them?
Like a shrewd of apes etc
A cottage. A cottage of gays.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony C
Previously known as a closet?Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Yes, although I believe it was called a closet of confirmed bachelors.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Talking of collective nouns, I discovered that the one for strumpets is 'A flourish' the other day. I shall certainly be using that.
A batch of benders. A cluster of queers. A pack of pooftas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony C
This is quite fun :-)
:hehe: That is quite goodQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
'He went out with a flourish' suddenly takes on a new meaning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I was just putting a page together and it was a profile of a chap who mentions in passing that his hobby is restoring old Morris Minors.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
I giggled for a good 20 minutes after I wrote the caption for his pic as 'Ian Spall: A passion for Minors'.
Then I deleted it because the law. :-(
Probably a good idea to delete - though in a caption, you might get away with it. I tried it on a interview with Andrew Trimble - a God bothering Ulster proddie who scored a few tries for Ireland by dint of playing with the best player of all time. There was picture of them together but my caption "Serving at the right hand of BOD" was deemed religiously insensitiveQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I think a scream of gays wins hands down though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
We've heard you like it hands down, h. Not that there is anything wrong with thatQuote:
Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman
All plumbers are bummers. Is that what's being implied here LA :rubchin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Let us consider the Freudian implications of a chap choosing a profession that involves poking about in faeces-filled pipes, bb.Quote:
Originally Posted by barrybueno
I think it’s fair to say that H’s insistence on his ferocious heterosexuality is fooling no-one.
Not that there’s anything wrong with being an accursed, God-forsaken sodomite, of course.
A Vaseline of Gays :hehe:
Lol yeah this is fun