Absolutely sickening, but uttelry unsurprising, to read the criticism of Charlie Hebdo’s superb

:gtsb:?

policy to be unimpeachable, which you are not.

The West is essentially fighting defensive wars against radical Islam, whereas radical Islam explicitly seeks to defeat and subjugate the West.

I was just pointing out the logical inconsistencies at play here, not to mention the ethical ones.

Because we do need to deal with them one way or another. And your hand-wringing about them is only valid if you have a realistic alternative strategy.

http://www.awimb.com/fudforum/index.php?t=tree&th=593082 &mid=4101683&rid=22&S=d91c346718015ba2e228b44fb f 294d9c&rev=&reveal=

I mean, to the untrained eye, it could look like the west has actually been on the offensive, being as it has been literally invading muslim countries for the majority of this century.

That's before we take into account the death tolls on either side.

http://www.awimb.com/fudforum/index.php?t=tree&th=593082 &mid=4101665&rid=293&S=136ac7bd3606eb7aa3c5dec7 d 1cbb3ca&rev=&reveal=