Without wanting to be pedantic, I believe this constitutes grounds for a mistrial. The accused is entitled to a jury that works to the best of its abilities.
Actually the chap who was chosen as foreman probably did a better job than I would have done, so it all worked out for the best.
08-11-2017, 12:59 PM
Peter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Actually the chap who was chosen as foreman probably did a better job than I would have done, so it all worked out for the best.
**** off. You let some mong take the Chair and you shafted the justice system just to get some gyppo banged up.
08-11-2017, 01:30 PM
IUFG
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
**** off. You let some mong take the Chair and you shafted the justice system just to get some gyppo banged up.
I am so pleased that diversity training wasn't wasted on you. p :-)
08-11-2017, 01:36 PM
Peter
Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
I am so pleased that diversity training wasn't wasted on you. p :-)
Diversity training doesn't work. Its what's inside the old tin of beans that matters.
I call it as I see it ;)
08-11-2017, 01:38 PM
Sir C
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
**** off. You let some mong take the Chair and you shafted the justice system just to get some gyppo banged up.
You malign me, p. Most unfair.
08-11-2017, 01:43 PM
Peter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
You malign me, p. Most unfair.
I am suggesting that it is an outrage that you did not lead this jury.
What is the world coming to?
08-11-2017, 01:45 PM
Sir C
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
I am suggesting that it is an outrage that you did not lead this jury.
What is the world coming to?
Younger chap did it. Possibly fresh from university. Charming fellow. I set him up to stand and deliver the verdict, then I told everyone the result we would deliver :shrug: