Friend of Obama :shrug:
Printable View
'Undefined' and 'asexual' :rolleyes:
with regards 'undefined, is actually quite sensible to consolidate all the made up ones into a single, simple category. wd the loonies imo
https://genderben.files.wordpress.co...er-options.jpg
Apparently...
A bigender gender-identity has been described as varying over time between two extremes. These periods can be anywhere from a few hours to a few years and there is no limit to the number of times that it may change.
Identifying as bigender is typically understood to mean that one identifies as both male and female or moves between a masculine gender expression and feminine gender expression with little middle ground, or both. This is different from identifying as genderfluid, as those who identify as genderfluid may not go back and forth between any fixed gender identities and may experience an entire range or spectrum of identities over time.
:nurse:
Is it not from Gulliver's Travels? The Bigenders were the ones who liked to eat eggs big end first and the Little Enders were the opposite and they went to war about it?
Are these people actually adopting names based on a satire of human idiocy for their ridiculous labels now? Remarkable.
It will, deeply unfortunately, require the rapes and or murders of several of those persons born with a vagina by those persons born with a penís who think they should have a vagina, or indeed both sets of genitals - all dependent on how their mental health is playing out at any given time - to sort this stuff out. These crimes will be perpetrated in a non-gender toilet, dormitory, changing room, prison, etc.
In sport, things like Wimbledon will become a single competition as will rugby, golf and football and when those born with a vagina slip from being ranked first in the World to 3,847th, or whatever, then there will be outcries of 'unfairness'.
The only way to stop this madness it to fully embrace it, I'm afraid.
That's not terribly 'woke', but there you go.
Hmmm. I'm not sure that will do it. If we have learned anything from things like Rotherham, FGM, etc, it is that authorities are willing to overlook the most heinous, widespread and revolting crimes against women and girls in pursuance of their insane political orthodoxies. Just as the fear of being labelled racist has silenced supposed 'progressives', so does the fear of being called 'transphobic' prevent them from calling out this madness.
where the host's daughter decided to join us, uninvited, and seemed to think she was the de facto centre of attention. Thought herself very knowing and interesting but still referred to her parents as mummy and daddy - you know the type.
She'd been to Jamaica and started warbling on about this "totally, like, amaaaazing black guy she'd met". One of the other guests asked her why she felt the colour of the chaps skin was significant.
The next two minutes saw this fella wiping the floor with her intellectually and unfortunately, mummy intervened on her behalf and rescued her as she clearly could not cope with the implication that she was the racist at the table.
Though I consider myself slightly left of centre I cannot tell you how much I detested this girl the second she opened her mouth.
:nod: It's remarkable the way in which many on the left cannot see that their fetishisation of race is in and of itself racist. It reduces individuals to their skin colour and expects them to behave in certain ways as a consequence. In many ways, it's a more pernicious form of racism than the more overt type, since it makes its victims complicit in their subjugation.