VAR is about to f*ck us here again

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult

Oh, I agree, but surely should have is a fairly decent synonym for expected in many regards?

But I don't really agree with it so I haven't looked into it enough to see how they work it out. DxGoes it take into account where all the opposition players are, how much time they had to control it and pick their spot etc? I think it's *******s, but I can see how you could have no spots actually on target but a high xG? Imagine you have ten shots all of which hit the woodwork. No ****s on target but you'd feel unlucky not to have had a comfortable win.

---

That's just it, NORMAL people would simply say "Should've scored."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redgunamo

That's just it, NORMAL people would simply say "Should've scored."

---

Oh, I'm totally with you if you want to replace xG with shS - should have scored. Much better to say we shS 2.3 instead of we had an xG of 2.3.

"We got 3 points but didn't have it entirely our own way as Fulham shS 0.44 goals."

I think we should make than an Awimb rule - xG is banned, from now on shS only.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WES

never clear and obvious in a million years.

And it was a pen

---

What annoyed me was that the Fulham player didn't even complain as he knew he'd fouled him first

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PSRB

What annoyed me was that the Fulham player didn't even complain as he knew he'd fouled him first

---

Same at Newcastle. The keeper didn't complain at all, he knew he'd fouled him.