Originally Posted by
Monty92
Ok, perhaps I mean I don't feel they've played their hand effectively.
The focus of their argument is that criticism of Israel can too easily slide into anti-semitism and that Corbyn is unwilling to tackle this. This is of course true, but it's also true that, for example, criticism of immigration can often slide into far right racism. Yet our tolerance of criticism of immigration seems to be far higher than it is of criticism of Israel. This to me is an unavoidable double standard.
And yet in Corbyn we have a man who has persistently throughout his life supported and defended people with the most disgusting anti-semitic views. He's also a man who recently sacked an MP for pointing out the fact that child rape gangs in this country have a cultural and ethnic common denominator.
Yet the focus seems to be on that very narrow point about criticism of Israel, rather than the far more damning evidence of Corbyn's dubious character, and that isn't actually going to have any effect.