No law in the land actually causes someone to massacre children
But the problem is that Chief is a f**king muppet. He ets stick because he deserves it.
http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/smile.gif
It got a bit personal over here
during the massacre down the road. It got me thinking. Me, a rational anti-gun person, started getting irrational. Like thinking, what would I have done if my kid was out there? I think I would have wanted to have a long range rifle and a fast boat.
but Guns - it is PRECISELY the same people (Chief included) who say 'blame the person not the gun'
who are100% against government spending money on people. It would be Big Government to ensure that all mental health needs are met. Look at their hysteria over Obamacare which merely states that everyone has to have some insurance.
The pro gun people are living in fantasyland and the sooner our country starts ignoring them the sooner we return to sanity.
Yes, we allowed gun ownership in the 50s 60's 70's when the US was the envy of the world - but we also provided health care to most. Reagan closed all the mental health hospitals - creating our homelessness problem, but saving rich people a few bucks.
As with everything, if you don't invest in it, you can't complain if it doesn't work.
for the record, I've never said that
just that blaming an inanimate object seems rather silly. Almost as delusional as blaming law abiding citizens that own guns for this atrocity.
Your MSNBC provided stereotypes don't fit, son.