Is the primary purpose of theatre not to entertain, m? That being the case, if wes was entertained, the play was successful, for him at least.
Good lord - quite the radical idea there, sir c
06-27-2017, 02:44 PM
Sir C
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Good lord - quite the radical idea there, sir c
Am I being naive, la? :-(
06-27-2017, 02:44 PM
Pokster
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Am I being naive, la? :-(
African defending
06-27-2017, 02:45 PM
Burney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Is the primary purpose of theatre not to entertain, m? That being the case, if wes was entertained, the play was successful, for him at least.
Could have fùcking fooled me.
Also, I would venture to suggest that WES would be entertained by watching chimps fling faeces. That does not ennoble the spectacle, however.
06-27-2017, 02:47 PM
Pokster
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Could have fùcking fooled me.
Also, I would venture to suggest that WES would be entertained by watching chimps fling faeces. That does not ennoble the spectacle, however.
But Chimps are fun b, I mean watching those rip another one to bits at Kansas Zoo must have been entertaining
06-27-2017, 02:48 PM
Sir C
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Could have fùcking fooled me.
Also, I would venture to suggest that WES would be entertained by watching chimps fling faeces. That does not ennoble the spectacle, however.
Lots of people are enjoy going to the theatre and are entertained :shrug: Clearly, wes is no arbiter of ojective quality in any matter, but I simply don't believe one can apply objective standards to a piece of entertainment.
06-27-2017, 02:49 PM
Burney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokster
But Chimps are fun b, I mean watching those rip another one to bits at Kansas Zoo must have been entertaining
Nasty bàstards, p. When they attack humans, they go first for the eyes and genitals, which seems a bit off to me.
Blind and dickiess is no way to go through life. :-(
06-27-2017, 02:50 PM
Ash
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Lots of people are enjoy going to the theatre and are entertained :shrug: Clearly, wes is no arbiter of ojective quality in any matter, but I simply don't believe one can apply objective standards to a piece of entertainment.
Except George Graham's 92-94 cup teams, of course.
06-27-2017, 02:51 PM
Burney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Lots of people are enjoy going to the theatre and are entertained :shrug: Clearly, wes is no arbiter of ojective quality in any matter, but I simply don't believe one can apply objective standards to a piece of entertainment.
We're not having this argument again. Clearly, Tolstoy is objectively better than Jackie Collins.
Also, I am prepared to bet that WES was largely there for the goatsex.
06-27-2017, 02:51 PM
Sir C
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Except George Graham's 92-94 cup teams, of course.
You're right, objectively I objected strongly to that dung ration.