It's now being remade with Andi Peters filling in, or is it Lenny Henry?
:alllookthesametome:
Printable View
Now steady on there. Nuanced thought that recognises that women do not all think and feel in the same way is way off message for AWIMB.
All the same, women are actually designed by evolution to be noticed and so while some restraint and discretion is advised, a chap shouldn't be too criminalised for the desire to look. Generally we are rebooting the old Victorian prudery for the 21st Century.
Okay so two things:
1. What about necks...some women have pleasing necks. Is that now off limits for me? A really good neck is a good turn on for me.
2. What about when I’m dancing in the club and the girl rubs her thigh on my co ck to gauge my size...can I call harassment on that and take to Twitter in incandescent rage?
I take it I’m no longer able to ask to borrow their phone so I can call a cab because someone stole mine in the club and then I dial my phone so I have their number and then I call them back in a few days.
F uck what about all the d ick picks I’ve sent out :banghead:
1. Staring at someone in a leering fashion, be it at her neck, leg, tit or earhole, is likely to make her uncomfortable and so is just bad manners. I don't really see how this is some sort of radical point.
2. If a girl rubs your cóck and that makes you feel harassed and enraged, by all means react accordingly, but I'm guessing it won't, so why would you make a fuss about it?
Sorry for my questions but Peter is talking about people doing bird for this.
They already banned cigarettes in there too :cry:
But can u imagine getting banged up for this? I mean sitting around playing cards / dominoes drinking hooch with the boys talking about what everyone did to get in there...robberies, murders, kidnapping, drugs and then you and your sexual harassment charge.
Your life would be misery. You’re just going to get laughed at for your entire stay.
Also, the thing about Morgan Freeman is that he had to age before people found him castable. Back in his earlier days -- I've seen these roles -- he's way too big and threatening, the achetypal scary and sexually threatening black man. No roles for him then. Therefore, it seems a bit much to come after the man after he had to be on hold, essentially, until he hit the age of 55!
One thing to note, I don't believe for a moment that Brad Pitt confronted Weinstein over his unwanted approach to Gwynneth Paltrow. It doesn't ring true. A little punk like Brad Pitt -- at that stage in his career -- would absolutely not have done that.
Apart from that, yeah, the guy has to go down.
In terms of Freeman, you can see how it worked. He just let his glance linger a bit too long, kind of was acting like a d!ck. An entire generation of people acting like d!cks can get shut down now, it appears.