Another bull**** decision

**** off with your red card.

The only other time I've seen anything similar was Xhaka v Swansea aa few years ago.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IUFG

**** off with your red card.

The only other time I've seen anything similar was Xhaka v Swansea aa few years ago.

---

Worst I've ever seen by many a mile.

What on earth possessed the ref to give that in the first place? But for var to look at it and agree.... that is a ****ing disgrace.

We could sent off for literally anything

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IUFG

**** off with your red card.

The only other time I've seen anything similar was Xhaka v Swansea aa few years ago.

---

Odd that he went straight for his back pocket too; he had a great view.

As for VAR, well ..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Peter

Worst I've ever seen by many a mile.

What on earth possessed the ref to give that in the first place? But for var to look at it and agree.... that is a ****ing disgrace.

We could sent off for literally anything

---

Mr Martinelli-two-yellows does it again.

A "letter of the law" excuse will be trotted out again, no doubt.

For the remainder of this match, there is zero margin for error in every tackle, or it's a red card. Logically, that applies. I think.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redgunamo

Odd that he went straight for his back pocket too; he had a great view.

As for VAR, well ..

---

They are claiming it was for serious foul play. So that trip apparently 'endangered the opponent or used brutal and excessive force'.

**** me. They should have stuck with denying a goalscoring opportunity. That was slightly less ludicrous

I thought we would struggle to see a worse decision that the declan rice one, but there it is.

Unbelievable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IUFG

Mr Martinelli-two-yellows does it again.

A "letter of the law" excuse will be trotted out again, no doubt.

For the remainder of this match, there is zero margin for error in every tackle, or it's a red card. Logically, that applies. I think.

---

They can't use letter of the law for this one. Letter of the law it is a yellow.

They'll trot out words like cynical abd deliberate without any reference to the actual rules. The 'there's too much of this sort of thing' argument.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Peter

They can't use letter of the law for this one. Letter of the law it is a yellow.

They'll trot out words like cynical abd deliberate without any reference to the actual rules. The 'there's too much of this sort of thing' argument.

---

Already a suggestion of "serious foul play" from PGMOL.

Like **** it is :hehe:

We get reffed differently.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IUFG

Already a suggestion of "serious foul play" from PGMOL.

Like **** it is :hehe:

We get reffed differently.

---

They put that out immediately. I guarantee it was goalscoring opportunity and var changed it instead of overturning it.

Absolute disgrace. This is what happens when the entire league hates you :-(

We are the perpetual example when refs want to make a point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Peter

They are claiming it was for serious foul play. So that trip apparently 'endangered the opponent or used brutal and excessive force'.

**** me. They should have stuck with denying a goalscoring opportunity. That was slightly less ludicrous

I thought we would struggle to see a worse decision that the declan rice one, but there it is.

Unbelievable.

---

Never a red but it was a seriously stupid challenge. It looked cynical and that was enough for that dipstick to send him off.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 7sisters

Never a red but it was a seriously stupid challenge. It looked cynical and that was enough for that dipstick to send him off.

---

Cynical, yes.

Brutal. Endangering. Excessive. It wasn't.