Did Chambers play CH for the Eng U21s? And if so, does this mean the manager

(whoever it is) thinks he's better than young Rob Holding?

So is CC better than RH, and if so, shouldn't we be keeping him?

People last season thought RH was a future Eng player, so if CC is better we could have the future Eng CH pairing. But the one game they played together, we got 4 put past us. (Though it was the first game of the season.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult

(whoever it is) thinks he's better than young Rob Holding?

So is CC better than RH, and if so, shouldn't we be keeping him?

People last season thought RH was a future Eng player, so if CC is better we could have the future Eng CH pairing. But the one game they played together, we got 4 put past us. (Though it was the first game of the season.)

---

:hehe: :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:

Is there nothing else to worry about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult

(whoever it is) thinks he's better than young Rob Holding?

So is CC better than RH, and if so, shouldn't we be keeping him?

People last season thought RH was a future Eng player, so if CC is better we could have the future Eng CH pairing. But the one game they played together, we got 4 put past us. (Though it was the first game of the season.)

---

They are both shÃ*t, especially Chambers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SWv2

They are both shÃ*t, especially Chambers.

---

Then:

1. Why are all our fans saying RH's better than Canavarro? {Could our fans really be that mistaken?}
2. If CC is especially ****, then why did the Eng U21 manager choose him over RH?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult

Then:

1. Why are all our fans saying RH's better than Canavarro? {Could our fans really be that mistaken?}
2. If CC is especially ****, then why did the Eng U21 manager choose him over RH?

---

Different managers have different views on players - this is hardly rocket science. I doubt Wenger and Aidy Boothroyd have much in common tbh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult

Then:

1. Why are all our fans saying RH's better than Canavarro? {Could our fans really be that mistaken?}
2. If CC is especially ****, then why did the Eng U21 manager choose him over RH?

---

In Italy they suggest Canavarro is a homosexual.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda

Different managers have different views on players - this is hardly rocket science. I doubt Wenger and Aidy Boothroyd have much in common tbh

---

What I'm sort of asking is if this means:

1. CC is actually good.
2. RH is actually ****.
3. This Boothroyd chap is wrong, and AW and the fans were right to think RH is good but CC is ****.

I just quite like CC, I thought he had potential as a CH in his early appearances, and would like him to be good. We used to win things when we had two Eng players at CH.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult

What I'm sort of asking is if this means:

1. CC is actually good.
2. RH is actually ****.
3. This Boothroyd chap is wrong, and AW and the fans were right to think RH is good but CC is ****.

I just quite like CC, I thought he had potential as a CH in his early appearances, and would like him to be good. We used to win things when we had two Eng players at CH.

---

:rolleyes: It really means none of these things. Mark Wright was preferred to Tony Adams and Steve Bould for England. That meant jack **** and this is ****ing u21 football

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SWv2

They are both shÃ*t, especially Chambers.

---

Still better than John Stones.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda

:rolleyes: It really means none of these things. Mark Wright was preferred to Tony Adams and Steve Bould for England. That meant jack **** and this is ****ing u21 football

---

Perfectly understandable; Mark Wright is from my manor. Excellent fellow.