I personally think rodgers has taken liverpool as
far as he can. Good football and some good good thrashings against teams played into his hands but no idea about defence and i think but deep down tacitcally taken them as far as he could. he get shown up when big manager set up well tacically against him.
2-0 at home to chelsea
2-1 to us in fa cup
1-0 to united in league cup
last season he lost to
oldham 3-2 in fa cup
northampton on pens in league cup
and many big league games.
He made some awful signings
aspras
alberto
moses
cissakho
jones
Which is why he be exposed in europe and long term . Personally if i were liverpool i let him go. He taken them as far as he can. I replace him with de boer or a top european tactical manager.
But hope liverpool keep them as he win f**k all their.
So, Modd, who was the first furriner to manage an English team?
I think it was arsene wenger though not sure
anyway in his first full season he won us the double.
rodgers is for me just another keegan, roy evans type manager. Nothing against him but out of his depth long term at top level
Re: So, McModd, who was the first furriner to manage an English team?
I thought he means outside the uk
We got over 100 million puma money to spend
so we have a chance
liverpool are f**ked. their have to play at least 6 more games. their squard even with few signings is streched and they have no defence
their struggle to get top four next year for me. their finish 5th or 6th and americans will sack rodgers like thei did rafa in 2010
liverpool won,t win the title in my lifetime thats for sure.
You think wrong. There was a saffa at Chester in the 1960s by the name of Peter Hauser. He won
The point is modern british manager can,t
cut it at top level clubs long term
rodgers is just another clueless keegan