The latest mad tranny shít is this one in Canada who's suing beauticians because they

[Burney]

refused to wax his lady cock and lady balls.

That's right, he's attempting to legally coerce women into touching his genitals at the risk of being fined or even losing their jobs.

This is progress, apparently.

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/there-are-only-losers-in-the-sad-saga-of-jessica-yaniv/

[Arsenal Alcoholic Review]

The Cultural Marxists are out of control

[PSRB]

refused to wax his lady cock and lady balls.

That's right, he's attempting to legally coerce women into touching his genitals at the risk of being fined or even losing their jobs.

This is progress, apparently.

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/there-are-only-losers-in-the-sad-saga-of-jessica-yaniv/

:hehe: was just about to post that, knew you'd enjoy it. Utterly mental

[barrybueno]

refused to wax his lady cock and lady balls.

That's right, he's attempting to legally coerce women into touching his genitals at the risk of being fined or even losing their jobs.

This is progress, apparently.

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/there-are-only-losers-in-the-sad-saga-of-jessica-yaniv/

Sounds like a cock and ball story to me B :sherlock:

[Burney]

:hehe: was just about to post that, knew you'd enjoy it. Utterly mental

In a funny way I do enjoy it. I think it's watching people find out what happens when you try and mandate an obvious falsehood as truth. Logic dictates that you will inevitably descend into absurdity and madness because - guess what? - you're trying to impose a demonstrably false concept onto an implacably physical world that isn't having it.
I also like it because it's a classic example of what happens when good intentions are allowed to trump facts.

[Burney]

Sounds like a cock and ball story to me B :sherlock:

They also think they have a right to have sex with lesbians, bb. Naturally, the lesbians disagree.

[barrybueno]

They also think they have a right to have sex with lesbians, bb. Naturally, the lesbians disagree.

Fair play for trying I guess. Like you say it's actually hilarious, it's one own goal after another. They'll do a multi billion pound 5 year study soon imo and determine it's all been a rather silly old load of nonsense.

[Burney]

Fair play for trying I guess. Like you say it's actually hilarious, it's one own goal after another. They'll do a multi billion pound 5 year study soon imo and determine it's all been a rather silly old load of nonsense.

Actually, people who've tried to do proper studies have been denied funding precisely because they are almost certain to come to the conclusion you describe. This is not a cult that like rational scrutiny, which is why they keep trying to shut down dissenting voices.

[AFC East]

Actually, people who've tried to do proper studies have been denied funding precisely because they are almost certain to come to the conclusion you describe. This is not a cult that like rational scrutiny, which is why they keep trying to shut down dissenting voices.

You need to team up with some TERFs :-)

I have sympathy with some of your views, but not everything responds well to reductivism.

[Burney]

You need to team up with some TERFs :-)

I have sympathy with some of your views, but not everything responds well to reductivism.

I'm wholly onboard with the TERFs. This thing is utter, utter nonsense and everyone needs to stop trying to be nice for a second (which is what has got us into this state in the first place) and wake the fúck up.

[PSRB]

I'm wholly onboard with the TERFs. This thing is utter, utter nonsense and everyone needs to stop trying to be nice for a second (which is what has got us into this state in the first place) and wake the fúck up.

I'd kind of hoped it's a phase and everyone (with a reasonable IQ) will realise that it was all a bit mental

[Burney]

I'd kind of hoping it's a phase and everyone (with a reasonable IQ) will realise that it was all a bit mental

The problem is that it's gone on so long now that there are serious negative social and professional consequences to pointing out that it's a bit mental. This means people keep quiet and that silence is interpreted as affirmation.

Difficult to see how we get out of it.

[PSRB]

The problem is that it's gone on so long now that there are serious negative social and professional consequences to pointing out that it's a bit mental. This means people keep quiet and that silence is interpreted as affirmation.

Difficult to see how we get out of it.

Social media's fault, allows small groups of idiots to have a louder voice than they should have and then other people take notice and think it's a far bigger issue than it actually is.

[AFC East]

Social media's fault, allows small groups of idiots to have a louder voice than they should have and then other people take notice and think it's a far bigger issue than it actually is.

These 'rights' evolved in the US, before social media was the huge influence it is now.

[Tony C]

So this is the person who got those two ladies banned!

Meghan Murphy banned for saying Men aren’t women and Lindsey done for responding to abuse she got from him.

Yet Twitter simply sends a request to Shaun King asking him to delete his tweets calling for the bombing of ICE facilities which led to one nut job from Antifa actually doing it!

[Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult]

I'm wholly onboard with the TERFs. This thing is utter, utter nonsense and everyone needs to stop trying to be nice for a second (which is what has got us into this state in the first place) and wake the fúck up.

Well, I saw what you did there and thought it rather funny.

I had to google it when I was called a TERF. I hadn't known it was a thing until that point. Had it not occurred to them that my sort of lefty thinks it a compliment to be called a radical feminist?

It's also oxymoronic. If you think, as I do, any post-op former male is a female, then I'd fight for her rights like any other woman as I'm non-discriminatory. But if they're saying they're trans, not women, as they have cocks and balls, then their rights wouldn't be covered by women's rights which is what feminism is about.

The rights of blokes in skirts is completely different to the rights of women.

[Burney]

Well, I saw what you did there and thought it rather funny.

I had to google it when I was called a TERF. I hadn't known it was a thing until that point. Had it not occurred to them that my sort of lefty thinks it a compliment to be called a radical feminist?

It's also oxymoronic. If you think, as I do, any post-op former male is a female, then I'd fight for her rights like any other woman as I'm non-discriminatory. But if they're saying they're trans, not women, as they have cocks and balls, then their rights wouldn't be covered by women's rights which is what feminism is about.

The rights of blokes in skirts is completely different to the rights of women.

No. A post-op former male is not a female because chromosomes, but they've at least put in the hard yards and I'll give them an easier ride than I will these chaps who want to prance about in dresses and go into ladies' lavatories while also wanting to fúck women with their female peníses. They are sex cases and need shooting.

[MalcomRats]

The Canadian government doesn't care what their people think.

[Sir C]

The Canadian government doesn't care what their people think.

I sense you have more to g8ve us on this subject Malcolm. Pray, continue.

[Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult]

No. A post-op former male is not a female because chromosomes, but they've at least put in the hard yards and I'll give them an easier ride than I will these chaps who want to prance about in dresses and go into ladies' lavatories while also wanting to fúck women with their female peníses. They are sex cases and need shooting.

B it's a culture war and your attitude - they may now have tits and fannies but that's not good enough - is what allows the fückwits to shout transphobe at sensible people like me.

If we say "Cock and balls = man. Tits and fannies = women. And the rights of all women must be protected." then it's much harder for them to argue. (And it means some feminist totty think I'm supercool and an honorary bint simply for stating a biological fact.)

Come on, mate. If they're so serious about it that they've lopped their cock off, at least let them pîss sitting down.

[Burney]

B it's a culture war and your attitude - they may now have tits and fannies but that's not good enough - is what allows the fückwits to shout transphobe at sensible people like me.

If we say "Cock and balls = man. Tits and fannies = women. And the rights of all women must be protected." then it's much harder for them to argue. (And it means some feminist totty think I'm supercool and an honorary bint simply for stating a biological fact.)

Come on, mate. If they're so serious about it that they've lopped their cock off, at least let them pîss sitting down.

You've got it completely, diametrically wrong. It's the acceptance of anyone at all who isn't biologically female as such which has got us to this point. That was the thin end of the wedge. The minute you accept that lie as truth, you open up every other absurd possibility that we've seen since. By saying 'Oh, well. You've had the surgery, so we'll say you're a real woman,' you're fúcked because you've conceded the idea that there can be such a thing as a non-biological female - and there can't be. Your rational argument is fatally undermined the moment you abandon rational, empirical reality in favour of cosy niceness.

The fact is, these people are always going to shout 'transphobe' at those who point out the truth because they want to shut down honest public debate of this nonsense by framing any view they don't like as bigotry. They want to make it impossible to challenge the orthodoxy because they know it doesn't stand up for a moment's intelligent scrutiny.