So a party leader sat in Parliament yesterday and listened to several of his

[Monty92]

backbenchers stand up and explicitly accuse him of being complicit in anti-Semitism.

And there’s absolutely no talk of him resigning. That’s pretty mental, no?

[Pat Vegas]

backbenchers stand up and explicitly accuse him of being complicit in anti-Semitism.

And there’s absolutely no talk of him resigning. That’s pretty mental, no?

it's accepted in the world unfortunately.
bit like making fun of the chinese.

[Sir C]

backbenchers stand up and explicitly accuse him of being complicit in anti-Semitism.

And there’s absolutely no talk of him resigning. That’s pretty mental, no?

But there's also no sign of those same backbenchers actually doing something about it, like resigning the whip. They are utterly gutless. Also spineless. #socialists

[Monty92]

But there's also no sign of those same backbenchers actually doing something about it, like resigning the whip. They are utterly gutless. Also spineless. #socialists

I would suggest that they are cleverly turning the screw.

And so entrenched are these attitudes, the leadership are actually incapable of responding without making things worse. Look at Diane Abbot's closing comments during yesterday's debate - backbenchers have called them a "disgrace". And Corbyn can't condemn one of his key allies, so that in turn turn cranks up the pressure on him

If backbenchers who want to force Corbyn out resign then they become powerless. Condemning him from within is far more effective.

[Burney]

I would suggest that they are cleverly turning the screw.

And so entrenched are these attitudes, the leadership are actually incapable of responding without making things worse. Look at Diane Abbot's closing comments during yesterday's debate - backbenchers have called them a "disgrace". And Corbyn can't condemn one of his key allies, so that in turn turn cranks up the pressure on him

If backbenchers who want to force Corbyn out resign then they become powerless. Condemning him from within is far more effective.

The problem is that there are enough anti-semites, Islamists, idiots/young people and purblind leftists around to keep him in power. He has his mandate and, as long as he's got that, they can't get rid of him. He won't resign because the hard left wants complete control of the party and will not let him go until they have in place the mechanisms and/or Parliamentary numbers in place to ensure leftist succession in any future leadership contest. Until then, they're in stalemate.

[World's End Stella]

I would suggest that they are cleverly turning the screw.

And so entrenched are these attitudes, the leadership are actually incapable of responding without making things worse. Look at Diane Abbot's closing comments during yesterday's debate - backbenchers have called them a "disgrace". And Corbyn can't condemn one of his key allies, so that in turn turn cranks up the pressure on him

If backbenchers who want to force Corbyn out resign then they become powerless. Condemning him from within is far more effective.

Diane Abbott went to Cambridge. I discovered this the other day after watching her on youtube demonstrating an astonishing lack of intellect.

And there was me thinking Oxbridge was only for the intellectually blessed.

[Sir C]

Diane Abbott went to Cambridge. I discovered this the other day after watching her on youtube demonstrating an astonishing lack of intellect.

And there was me thinking Oxbridge was only for the intellectually blessed.

I expect the place she attended was formally known as the Polytechnic of East Anglia, and that she took an HND in Food Hygiene.

[Rich]

backbenchers stand up and explicitly accuse him of being complicit in anti-Semitism.

And there’s absolutely no talk of him resigning. That’s pretty mental, no?

A shame, really. But I have started questioning how much I really care. I feel as though the present status quo will always be maintained and we'll always have a fairly centre line party (whether it be slightly right or left of centre).

That suits me so I'll just plod along.

[Burney]

A shame, really. But I have started questioning how much I really care. I feel as though the present status quo will always be maintained and we'll always have a fairly centre line party (whether it be slightly right or left of centre).

That suits me so I'll just plod along.

Complacency is pretty dangerous. Were there some sort of terrible crisis or scandal that damaged the tory party fatally, we would have Corbyn's Labour Party running the country by default. I agree that that is unlikely, but the mere possibility is so terrifyingly calamitous that it should terrify any sane person.

[Monty92]

Complacency is pretty dangerous. Were there some sort of terrible crisis or scandal that damaged the tory party fatally, we would have Corbyn's Labour Party running the country by default. I agree that that is unlikely, but the mere possibility is so terrifyingly calamitous that it should terrify any sane person.

The thing is, his stated economic policies are not actually that radical at all, are they?

[Burney]

The thing is, his stated economic policies are not actually that radical at all, are they?

They are populist socialism designed to snare the terminally naive. In reality, we'd be dealing with high taxation, capital flight, renationalisation, a complete stop on inward investment and the hobbling of our most successful industry. All overseen by some of the lowest-quality intellects I've ever seen on a front bench.

It would, in short, be a total and utter sh1tshow.

[Sir C]

The thing is, his stated economic policies are not actually that radical at all, are they?

Well, stating that the costs of nationalising the water and energy companies wouldn't be a problem because they would only pay what they fancied for these businesses demonstrates that we are dealing with a dictatorial, radical ideology which is prepared to admit that it has no respect for property rights. They will steal your money, your property and then your freedom. #socialists

[IUFG]

and that she took an HND in Food Hygiene.

I still wouldn't want the thick fúcker making me a sandwich. She'd, no doubt, fúck it up.

[Peter]

I expect the place she attended was formally known as the Polytechnic of East Anglia, and that she took an HND in Food Hygiene.

Nope. Didnt exist then, nor ever as that name.

She went to Newnham College, the one for women. Obviously the intellectual requirement doesnt exist there :)