When offering advantage shouldn't the ref take into consideration

[Herbert Augustus Chapman]

the shítness of the team to whom advantage is offered?

[barrybueno]

I'd like to see the offside rule scrapped, what dy'a think about that H?

[Herbert Augustus Chapman]

I'd like to see the offside rule scrapped, what dy'a think about that H?

I think you're a loon b and the only thing that should be scrapped is your liver.

[PSRB]

the shítness of the team to whom advantage is offered?

Also, if your striker (who is likely to be useful in actually finishing the advantage) is wiped out then there isn't really much of an advantage. The officials were generally terrible yesterday

[SWv2]

Also, if your striker (who is likely to be useful in actually finishing the advantage) is wiped out then there isn't really much of an advantage. The officials were generally terrible yesterday


3rd goal was bad officiating by the lino but equally we just seemed to stop dead and all went a little slow motion. These things are so split second that to just stop as we did was pish.

Anyhow, that aside can’t remember a lot. The pen I have no issue with at all, of course Sterling could have stayed on his feet but nobody really expected him to and we would all to a man want the decision to be given in the other area. Monreal came in from behind or the side and made contact with the player and none with the ball.

Thought we largely got away with it mind you, they were at times very careless with final passes and on a sharper day it could have been a greater losing margin.

The Coquelin thing is largely being blown out of proportion, we didn’t lose because he played. The Lacazette thing fúcking pisses me off mind you.

[Ash]

The Coquelin thing is largely being blown out of proportion, we didn’t lose because he played. The Lacazette thing fúcking pisses me off mind you.

Coquelin actually made a couple of fine tackles. I'd rather have Debuchy as a stand-in but he played 90 on Thursday. When Wenger writes his book perhaps he'll explain why he spent £52m on a striker he didn't use that much.

[SWv2]

Coquelin actually made a couple of fine tackles. I'd rather have Debuchy as a stand-in but he played 90 on Thursday. When Wenger writes his book perhaps he'll explain why he spent £52m on a striker he didn't use that much.

Yes I suspect MD was not a viable option because of his many injuries, now Elneny is not as easy to understand.

The absence of Lacazette had me swearing out loud and being told off for it. Just don’t get it myself but who are you or I to question AW etc. Hindsight being a marvellous thing altogether would allow us to suggest Sanchez should not have played but then if you don’t play him he might get upset and not sign the new deal waiting for him in his agent’s office.

[IUFG]

The Coquelin thing is largely being blown out of proportion, we didn’t lose because he played.

True

However, the whole thing smacked of "we have to do something" because we're playing against the best team in the league. Yet, it appears we really didn't know what that "something" was.

Overall, a poor performance. We looked very panicky because of their pressing. Our pressing, of course, was a load of uncoordinated *******s.

In summary, Wenger out!

[PSRB]

True

However, the whole thing smacked of "we have to do something" because we're playing against the best team in the league. Yet, it appears we really didn't know what that "something" was.

Overall, a poor performance. We looked very panicky because of their pressing. Our pressing, of course, was a load of uncoordinated *******s.

In summary, Wenger out!

Sanchez was ****ing awful. May as well have played for City, Ramsey was also dire.

[SWv2]

Sanchez was ****ing awful. May as well have played for City, Ramsey was also dire.

Ramsey and Xhaka were both poor, chasing shadows as such with Silva and de Bruyne.

Ozil, Sanchez, Iwobi – all poor, anonymous almost for large periods. The most animated or aggressive thing MO did all day was kick the ball away late on. I suspect he would be a lovely player in this City team all the same.

You see how I am struggling here with the suggestion we were the better team?

[PSRB]

Ramsey and Xhaka were both poor, chasing shadows as such with Silva and de Bruyne.

Ozil, Sanchez, Iwobi – all poor, anonymous almost for large periods. The most animated or aggressive thing MO did all day was kick the ball away late on. I suspect he would be a lovely player in this City team all the same.

You see how I am struggling here with the suggestion we were the better team?

I thought Mesut worked really hard :shrug:

[Pokster]

Yes I suspect MD was not a viable option because of his many injuries, now Elneny is not as easy to understand.

The absence of Lacazette had me swearing out loud and being told off for it. Just don’t get it myself but who are you or I to question AW etc. Hindsight being a marvellous thing altogether would allow us to suggest Sanchez should not have played but then if you don’t play him he might get upset and not sign the new deal waiting for him in his agent’s office.

Didn't watch the game, only highlights, but seemed strange to not go with what worked at Chelsea.

Wenger out

[redgunamo]

Didn't watch the game, only highlights, but seemed strange to not go with what worked at Chelsea.

Wenger out

We ran out of central defenders apparently. Injury, illness; that sort of thing.

[Peter]

We ran out of central defenders apparently. Injury, illness; that sort of thing.

Apart from the two players on the bench who have played there in europa league games. It was a baffling decision.

At least I get the lacazette decision even if I think it's absurd.

[Hanknguyen]

Quy hoạch hạ tầng lÃ* má»™t trong những ná»�n tảng quan trá»�ng trong việc thu hút dân cÆ°, vốn đầu tÆ° vÃ* thúc đẩy sá»± phát triển. Riêng tại TP.HCM trong những năm vừa qua luôn có tốc Ä‘á»™ triển khai hạ tầng nhanh vÃ* tạo ra những Ä‘á»™t phá vÃ* sức hút mạnh mẽ, trong đó khu vá»±c phÃ*a Ä�ông vÃ* Ä�ông Bắc thÃ*nh phố vẫn tiếp tục lÃ* tâm Ä‘iểm.

http://saigonriversidecitydatxanh.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Slide9.jpg (http://saigonriversidecitydatxanh.com/can-ho-saigon-riverside-city-thu-duc-thu-hut-hon-1200-nguoi-tham-du/)

BÙNG Ná»” Háº* TẦNG, KHU Ä�ÔNG DUY TRÃŒ Ä�À PHÃ�T TRIỂN

Khu Ä�ông SÃ*i Gòn bao gồm Quáº*n 2, Quáº*n 9 vÃ* Thủ Ä�ức luôn có tiá»�m năng phát triển lá»›n vá»›i các trục giao thông liên vùng lá»›n nhÆ° đại lá»™ Phạm Văn Ä�ồng, Quốc lá»™ 13, đại lá»™ Mai ChÃ* Thá»�, xa lá»™ HÃ* Ná»™i… Giai Ä‘oạn 2012-2020, quanh các trục giao thông chiến lược nÃ*y có 11 dá»± án hạ tầng lá»›n nhá»�, tổng kinh phÃ* chiếm gần 70% tổng nguồn vốn đầu tÆ°, trong đó có thể kể đến các công trình nổi báº*t nhÆ°: Cao tốc TP.HCM-Long ThÃ*nh-Dầu Giây, đại lá»™ Mai ChÃ* Thá»�, hầm Thủ Thiêm, tuyến Metro số 1….

TRIỂN VỌNG �ẦU TƯ

ChÃ*nh vì lẽ đó, dá»± án Saigon Riverside City (http://canhointelasaigon.com/can-ho-saigon-riverside-city-thu-duc/) vá»›i vị thế vÃ*ng mặt tiá»�n sông SÃ*i Gòn vÃ* kết nối đại lá»™ Phạm Văn Ä�ồng, được xem lÃ* má»™t trong những dá»± án khá hiếm hoi trong bối cảnh những quỹ đất trung tâm vÃ* cạnh sông SÃ*i Gòn ngÃ*y cÃ*ng khan hiếm. dá»± án Saigon Riverside City (http://canhointelasaigon.com/can-ho-saigon-riverside-city-thu-duc/) hưởng trá»�n lợi thế mặt tiá»�n sông SÃ*i Gòn, mang phong cách thiết kế của má»™t resort sinh thái ven sông vá»›i gần 100% căn há»™ Ä‘á»�u có hÆ°á»›ng nhìn đẹp vá»� sông SÃ*i Gòn, hồ sinh thái vÃ* hệ thống công viên bên trong dá»± án, tất cả sẽ mang đến cho cÆ° dân những giá trị sống hoÃ*n mỹ vÃ* riêng biệt.

Kèm theo đó lÃ* má»™t thế giá»›i tiện Ã*ch thu nhá»�, được quy hoạch hoÃ*n chỉnh vÃ* khép kÃ*n ngay bên trong dá»± án vá»›i 6 phân khu, 36 tiện Ã*ch chuẩn resort cao cấp nhÆ°: bến du thuyá»�n, Ä‘Æ°á»�ng tản bá»™ vÃ* công viên cạnh bá»� sông, quảng trÆ°á»�ng trung tâm, phố ánh sáng, phố mua sắm, hồ bÆ¡i, khu thể thao trong nhÃ* vÃ* ngoÃ*i trá»�i, vÆ°á»�n BBQ, hồ sinh thái, vÆ°á»�n treo… Ä�ồng thá»�i bên trong dá»± án còn có trung tâm thÆ°Æ¡ng mại 04 tầng táº*p trung hÆ¡n 15.000m2 trong tổng số hÆ¡n 24.000m2 sÃ*n thượng mại của toÃ*n dá»± án, đáp ứng tất cả nhu cầu mua sắm, giải trÃ*, ăn uống, chăm sóc sức khá»�e… không chỉ cho cÆ° dân bên trong dá»± án mÃ* còn lÃ* Ä‘iểm đến cho cÆ° dân trong khu vá»±c.

http://saigonriversidecitydatxanh.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Slide17-1.jpg (http://saigonriversidecitydatxanh.com/diem-nhan-co-ha-tang-khu-dong-sai-gon/)

NGAY KHU Vá»°C PHÃ�T TRIỂN Máº*NH MẼ CỦA Háº* TẦNG KHU Ä�ÔNG

dá»± án Saigon Riverside City (http://canhointelasaigon.com/can-ho-saigon-riverside-city-thu-duc/) vá»›i vị trÃ* tá»�a lạc tại mặt tiá»�n Ä‘Æ°á»�ng Xô Viết Nghệ TÄ©nh – Quốc lá»™ 13 quy hoạch lá»™ giá»›i 60m, nối liá»�n đại lá»™ Phạm Văn Ä�ồng, từ Saigon Riverside City, bạn có thể di chuyển nhanh đến sân bay Tân SÆ¡n Nhất qua đại lá»™ Phạm Văn Ä�ồng, cÅ©ng nhÆ° di chuyển đến trung tâm Quáº*n 1 chỉ khoảng 15 phút. Cùng lợi thế hạ tầng, dân cÆ° hiện hữu, chỉ trong bán kÃ*nh 2km, bạn có thể táº*n hưởng Ä‘a dạng dịch vụ hiện hữu nhÆ°: Bệnh viện quốc tế Hạnh Phúc, Coopmart Bình Triệu, Chợ Bình triệu, Vincom Mall, Ä�ại há»�c Luáº*t, trÆ°á»�ng há»�c các cấp… đồng thá»�i kết nối vá»›i khu đô thị Vạn Phúc quy mô 198ha đã hình thÃ*nh vá»›i các dịch vụ cao cấp: công viên giải trÃ* lá»›n nhất Ä�ông Nam Ã� rá»™ng 21,5ha, bệnh viện quốc tế quy mô 500 giÆ°á»�ng…

[Ash]

[size=4]Q....

You keep saying that.

[redgunamo]

Apart from the two players on the bench who have played there in europa league games. It was a baffling decision.

At least I get the lacazette decision even if I think it's absurd.

Yeah, but if you have no actual specialists, all bets are off, I reckon.

Agree about #LacaWasteOfMoney though :-(

[Peter]

Yeah, but if you have no actual specialists, all bets are off, I reckon.

Agree about #LacaWasteOfMoney though :-(

Debuchy is arguably far closer to being a specialist than the other two. And far better at it. It would also have allowed Koscielny to stay in the centre of the three.

We would still have lost, obviously.