I see things are now at the stage where men are being required to undergo the ritual

[Burney]

public humiliation of a confession of every sexually inappropriate thing they've ever done in order to appease the 'Me Too' witch hunt. Even having to publicly admit in a national newspaper that you've consumed 'sexist' pornography (there's another kind?). :hehe:

Nothing at all weird or unsettling about that. Oh, no. It's not at all cultural revolution-ey.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/20/men-silent-me-too-sexism

[The Rob2]

corr not me

I read about so many crimes that were just banter in my day

#notme

[Burney]

corr not me

i read about so many crimes that were just banter in my day

#notme

Admit that you once may have looked down a girl's top, you abuser! Confess! Confess!

[IUFG]

Admit that you once may have looked down a girl's top, you abuser! Confess! Confess!

I did shake my head when he confessed to "There were more times when I stared at women inappropriately. Once I even dared to tell a classmate I had been looking at her chest."

**** me, is looking the new sexual assault?

[Peter]

public humiliation of a confession of every sexually inappropriate thing they've ever done in order to appease the 'Me Too' witch hunt. Even having to publicly admit in a national newspaper that you've consumed 'sexist' pornography (there's another kind?). :hehe:

Nothing at all weird or unsettling about that. Oh, no. It's not at all cultural revolution-ey.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/20/men-silent-me-too-sexism

Unlearning, how appropriate.

Just out of interest, the article shows a sign that says 'C*nt touch this'.......it doesnt appear to make sense.

I am happy to admit that I have looked at women's bodies. I have tried to be subtle about it but have apparently failed to be on many occasions.

I wish I could say that I was sorry and that it will never happen again but I am afraid it just isn't true. I will do it again.

[Peter]

I did shake my head when he confessed to "There were more times when I stared at women inappropriately. Once I even dared to tell a classmate I had been looking at her chest."

**** me, is looking the new sexual assault?

There is a difference between having a look and saying 'I am looking at your tits' .....

[IUFG]

There is a difference between having a look and saying 'I am looking at your tits' .....

Yes, of course. But why he would say this to a woman, I have no idea.

I'm sure she was aware of this, without him pointing it out.

[Sir C]

Unlearning, how appropriate.

Just out of interest, the article shows a sign that says 'C*nt touch this'.......it doesnt appear to make sense.

I am happy to admit that I have looked at women's bodies. I have tried to be subtle about it but have apparently failed to be on many occasions.

I wish I could say that I was sorry and that it will never happen again but I am afraid it just isn't true. I will do it again.

It's the bottoms that get me, p. :sigh:

[Burney]

Yes, of course. But why he would say this to a woman, I have no idea.

I'm sure she was aware of this, without him pointing it out.

I don’t think anyone realises this yet, but he reads like a man suffering severe sexual repression. His ‘confession’ sounds exactly the same as someone who’s been indoctrinated by a religion to feel ashamed of his entirely natural sexual instincts.

Well it’s not like ideologies that demand sexual shame from men ever end badly, is it? :rolleyes:

[IUFG]

I don’t think anyone realises this yet, but he reads like a man suffering severe sexual repression.

he reads like a man who is a complete and utter wet.

The sort that orders a small Chardonnay at the bar.

[Burney]

It's the bottoms that get me, p. :sigh:

Yes. Breasts are the snare if the younger, less inexperienced fellow, I think.

Arses, on the other hand...arses. Yes....Mmmmm.

Sorry, what were we talking about?

[Sir C]

Yes. Breasts are the snare if the younger, less inexperienced fellow, I think.

Arses, on the other hand...arses. Yes....Mmmmm.

Sorry, what were we talking about?

Kinckers knackers knockers!

[Burney]

he reads like a man who is a complete and utter wet.

The sort that orders a small Chardonnay at the bar.

I saw a hilarious thread on twitter where a silly **** in a hat who claims to be a female must ally was proudly saying he never flirts because he doesn’t ‘want to be that guy’ - and then complaining that he never gets anywhere with women :hehe:

[redgunamo]

public humiliation of a confession of every sexually inappropriate thing they've ever done in order to appease the 'Me Too' witch hunt. Even having to publicly admit in a national newspaper that you've consumed 'sexist' pornography (there's another kind?). :hehe:

Nothing at all weird or unsettling about that. Oh, no. It's not at all cultural revolution-ey.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/20/men-silent-me-too-sexism


Finally an industry in which the dollies command better pay than the blokes :shrug:

[Sir C]

I saw a hilarious thread on twitter where a silly **** in a hat who claims to be a feminist ally was proudly saying he never flirts because he doesn’t ‘want to be that guy’ - and then complaining that he never gets anywhere with women :hehe:

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?

[Burney]

Kinckers knackers knockers!

Of course, arses are also good because - unlike tits - you can gawp at them to your heart’s content without the object of your attention noticing. With breasts, you have to be subtle :nod:

Oh, god! I’m basically Harvey Weinstein, aren’t I? :-(

[IUFG]

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?

It is all about the apps nowadays, sc.

They go in pubs, open the app and see who is available.

In other words, you can now be rejected without ever speaking to the person.

[redgunamo]

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?

Simply by having been brought up right, I think.

[Burney]

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?

I think it’d be OK. Most people are still sane, I think - it’s just that the loonies are given credence.

[Burney]

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?

I think it’d be OK. Most people are still sane, I think - it’s just that the loonies are given credence.

[Pokster]

Of course, arses are also good because - unlike tits - you can gawp at them to your heart’s content without the object of your attention noticing. With breasts, you have to be subtle :nod:

Oh, god! I’m basically Harvey Weinstein, aren’t I? :-(

No, he had loads of women, you are almost a virgin in comparison

[PSRB]

It's the bottoms that get me, p. :sigh:

Legs for me

[Sir C]

Legs for me

I'll save some for you :thumbup:

[Peter]

I'll save some for you :thumbup:

One may as well have a glance at the whole thing.

[redgunamo]

One may as well have a glance at the whole thing.

Indeed, P. The IPSF is on the case, as we speak

http://www.bbc.com/sport/41652997