This prosthetic pen1s rape case thingummy's bloody odd

[Burney]

I'm afraid I simply don't believe the 'victim' can have had no idea there wasn't something a bit odd going on.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-40668960

[IUFG]

I'm afraid I simply don't believe the 'victim' can have had no idea there wasn't something a bit odd going on.

The victim is probably a bit 'special', b.

[The Rob2]

it's genius really

they should make a film about it

[IUFG]

it's genius really

they should make a film about it

I mean, how gullible must this vicitm have been to agree or even acquiesce to the perp's demands, without being a leeeeeetle bit radio?

[Burney]

I mean, how gullible must this vicitm have been to agree or even acquiesce to the perp's demands, without being a leeeeeetle bit radio?

Dunno. But would it still be a sexual assault if it had actually been a man - just not the man the victim thought it was?

[PSRB]

I'm afraid I simply don't believe the 'victim' can have had no idea there wasn't something a bit odd going on.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-40668960

6 1/2 years for consensual sex......

[Pokster]

6 1/2 years for consensual sex......

Perhaps Monty should take the ladyboy to court he shagged in Brazil (or wherever he was)

[Burney]

6 1/2 years for consensual sex......

Yes. Seems a bit much, doesn't it? Also, if sleeping with people while not having been entirely truthful with them beforehand is sexual assault, we're all in trouble :yikes:

[Burney]

Perhaps Monty should take the ladyboy to court he shagged in Brazil (or wherever he was)

That is one of the least elegantly constructed sentences that's been written on here since snin left, p. Well done.

[Pokster]

That is one of the least elegantly constructed sentences that's been written on here since snin left, p. Well done.

It's a Friday b, the day for not thinking about what you type

[Pokster]

Yes. Seems a bit much, doesn't it? Also, if sleeping with people while not having been entirely truthful with them beforehand is sexual assault, we're all in trouble :yikes:

I would say that pretending you are a different sex is a bit more than "not being entirley truthful"

[Ash]

I would say that pretending you are a different sex is a bit more than "not being entirley truthful"

But isn't pretending to be a different sex all the rage now?

[Burney]

I would say that pretending you are a different sex is a bit more than "not being entirley truthful"

Yes, but where do we draw the line? How big does the lie have to be to make it sexual assault? Is telling them you're not married when you are going to constitute sexual assault?

[Burney]

But isn't pretending to be a different sex all the rage now?

Hang on! This is an excellent point. The defendant's brief could have got her off by saying she'd changed her name to Kye Fortune and identified as a man. That would have put the cat among the pigeons. :hehe:

[redgunamo]

Hang on! This is an excellent point. The defendant's brief could have got her off by saying she'd changed her name to Kye Fortune and identified as a man. That would have put the cat among the pigeons. :hehe:

:hehe: Bringing charges is practically a hate crime :-(

[Burney]

:hehe: Bringing charges is practically a hate crime :-(

It would have been tremendous fun. The court would almost certainly have been forced to rule that just saying you're a certain gender doesn't actually make you that gender. At which point, a lot of people's heads would have exploded and many Guardian column inches would have been filled. :hehe:

Missed opportunity, really.