View Full Version : Did Chambers play CH for the Eng U21s? And if so, does this mean the manager
Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
06-29-2017, 03:01 PM
(whoever it is) thinks he's better than young Rob Holding?
So is CC better than RH, and if so, shouldn't we be keeping him?
People last season thought RH was a future Eng player, so if CC is better we could have the future Eng CH pairing. But the one game they played together, we got 4 put past us. (Though it was the first game of the season.)
Pat Vegas
06-29-2017, 03:15 PM
(whoever it is) thinks he's better than young Rob Holding?
So is CC better than RH, and if so, shouldn't we be keeping him?
People last season thought RH was a future Eng player, so if CC is better we could have the future Eng CH pairing. But the one game they played together, we got 4 put past us. (Though it was the first game of the season.)
:hehe: :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
Is there nothing else to worry about.
(whoever it is) thinks he's better than young Rob Holding?
So is CC better than RH, and if so, shouldn't we be keeping him?
People last season thought RH was a future Eng player, so if CC is better we could have the future Eng CH pairing. But the one game they played together, we got 4 put past us. (Though it was the first game of the season.)
They are both shít, especially Chambers.
Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
06-29-2017, 03:30 PM
They are both shít, especially Chambers.
Then:
1. Why are all our fans saying RH's better than Canavarro? {Could our fans really be that mistaken?}
2. If CC is especially ****, then why did the Eng U21 manager choose him over RH?
Luis Anaconda
06-29-2017, 03:32 PM
Then:
1. Why are all our fans saying RH's better than Canavarro? {Could our fans really be that mistaken?}
2. If CC is especially ****, then why did the Eng U21 manager choose him over RH?
Different managers have different views on players - this is hardly rocket science. I doubt Wenger and Aidy Boothroyd have much in common tbh
Pat Vegas
06-29-2017, 03:34 PM
Then:
1. Why are all our fans saying RH's better than Canavarro? {Could our fans really be that mistaken?}
2. If CC is especially ****, then why did the Eng U21 manager choose him over RH?
In Italy they suggest Canavarro is a homosexual.
Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
06-29-2017, 03:54 PM
Different managers have different views on players - this is hardly rocket science. I doubt Wenger and Aidy Boothroyd have much in common tbh
What I'm sort of asking is if this means:
1. CC is actually good.
2. RH is actually ****.
3. This Boothroyd chap is wrong, and AW and the fans were right to think RH is good but CC is ****.
I just quite like CC, I thought he had potential as a CH in his early appearances, and would like him to be good. We used to win things when we had two Eng players at CH.
Luis Anaconda
06-29-2017, 04:02 PM
What I'm sort of asking is if this means:
1. CC is actually good.
2. RH is actually ****.
3. This Boothroyd chap is wrong, and AW and the fans were right to think RH is good but CC is ****.
I just quite like CC, I thought he had potential as a CH in his early appearances, and would like him to be good. We used to win things when we had two Eng players at CH.
:rolleyes: It really means none of these things. Mark Wright was preferred to Tony Adams and Steve Bould for England. That meant jack **** and this is ****ing u21 football
redgunamo
06-29-2017, 04:02 PM
They are both shít, especially Chambers.
Still better than John Stones.
redgunamo
06-29-2017, 04:09 PM
:rolleyes: It really means none of these things. Mark Wright was preferred to Tony Adams and Steve Bould for England. That meant jack **** and this is ****ing u21 football
Perfectly understandable; Mark Wright is from my manor. Excellent fellow.
The Rob2
06-29-2017, 10:33 PM
They are both shít, especially Chambers.
he had a good game in the final, everything that came before has been forgotten
Holding and Mert next season oh the JOY
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.