It is our fault if we don't get top four but

[Mo Britain less Europe]

I can't help but feel aggrieved at the blatant favouritism which the referee showed towards Citeh against Leicester. Basically won them the game single-handed.

[barrybueno]

I can't help but feel aggrieved at the blatant favouritism which the referee showed towards Citeh against Leicester. Basically won them the game single-handed.

Come now Mo, you know piss-poor dog****e refereeing evens itself out over a season. its just human nature to think the last few games are somehow more important than at any other stage of the season.

[Mo Britain less Europe]

It does even out when it's the odd mistake. But consider this: both Citeh's goals were illegal and Leicester had a perfectly good goal ruled out in bizarre circumstances. That's not just an unfortunate mistake.

[Luis Anaconda]

It does even out when it's the odd mistake. But consider this: both Citeh's goals were illegal and Leicester had a perfectly good goal ruled out in bizarre circumstances. That's not just an unfortunate mistake.

Did they have a goal chalked off as well as Marhez's penalty - you surely can't be saying that was the perfectly good goal disallowed?

[Pokster]

It does even out when it's the odd mistake. But consider this: both Citeh's goals were illegal and Leicester had a perfectly good goal ruled out in bizarre circumstances. That's not just an unfortunate mistake.

Having not watched the game.. why were City's goals dodgy, and what Leicester goal was incorrectly ruled out (you can't mean the penaltyas that was the correct decision... even if it is unlucky)

[Mo Britain less Europe]

Sterling was offside and interfering with the keeper and defender, Silva was well onside. The penalty was Sane diving over the Leicester defender's body.

Not the correct decision if it was for taking two touches. He slipped on taking it and the ball hit his other leg. It was unintentional so he therefore didn't "take" two touches. If you slip and eff up on the run-in you don't get a retake or anything, if he had an involuntary advantage it's the same. Those goals (not that it happens often) are never disallowed.

[Luis Anaconda]

Sterling was offside and interfering with the keeper and defender, Silva was well onside. The penalty was Sane diving over the Leicester defender's body.

Not the correct decision if it was for taking two touches. He slipped on taking it and the ball hit his other leg. It was unintentional so he therefore didn't "take" two touches. If you slip and eff up on the run-in you don't get a retake or anything, if he had an involuntary advantage it's the same. Those goals (not that it happens often) are never disallowed.
:hehe: Utterly ludicrous about Man City penalty - nailed on. Far more so than Marhez falling over thin air as Clichy pulled his foot away

And you are simply wrong about the penalty as the law stands, I'm afraid. Counts as playing the ball - hence the referee was right.

[Luis Anaconda]

Having not watched the game.. why were City's goals dodgy, and what Leicester goal was incorrectly ruled out (you can't mean the penaltyas that was the correct decision... even if it is unlucky)

Apparently this isn't a pen :hehe:

https://twitter.com/Pav90/status/863682519857803264

[Viva Prat Vegas]

Sterling was offside and interfering with the keeper and defender, Silva was well onside. The penalty was Sane diving over the Leicester defender's body.

Not the correct decision if it was for taking two touches. He slipped on taking it and the ball hit his other leg. It was unintentional so he therefore didn't "take" two touches. If you slip and eff up on the run-in you don't get a retake or anything, if he had an involuntary advantage it's the same. Those goals (not that it happens often) are never disallowed.

Penalty Laws

"The kicker must not play the ball again until it has touched another player"
"If the kicker slips and effs up on the run-UP laughter is awarded"

[Mo Britain less Europe]

Ball's gone, defender has his body on the ground. Sane hits him with his knee and dives acrobatically.

No quibbles about citeh's goal being offside then?

[Sir C]

Apparently this isn't a pen :hehe:

https://twitter.com/Pav90/status/863682519857803264

13 years ago today we sat on the Clock End and watched us life the :trophy:

What the fúck were we doing at football on a Monday?

[barrybueno]

Apparently this isn't a pen :hehe:

https://twitter.com/Pav90/status/863682519857803264

**** me :hehe: Not sure Mo has a leg to stand on there :judge: Sane almost lost one.

[Luis Anaconda]

Ball's gone, defender has his body on the ground. Sane hits him with his knee and dives acrobatically.

No quibbles about citeh's goal being offside then?

No - that was the wrong decision. Your view of the penalty has clearly been distorted by the slow motion replay. It is absolutely nailed on. The ball hasn't gone for a start

[Mo Britain less Europe]

Well slow motion is really the important way to see it isn't it? Look at Crouchie's "goal"

[Pat Vegas]

I can't help but feel aggrieved at the blatant favouritism which the referee showed towards Citeh against Leicester. Basically won them the game single-handed.

we stole 6 points from Burnley this season.

well not really we. you know what I mean. we won both games. stealing them of erm draws so 2 points

[Peter]

Apparently this isn't a pen :hehe:

https://twitter.com/Pav90/status/863682519857803264

It doesn't look like a penalty to me.

Although that is largely because the video wouldn't play :)

[Alberto Balsam Rodriguez]

Come now Mo, you know piss-poor dog****e refereeing evens itself out over a season. its just human nature to think the last few games are somehow more important than at any other stage of the season.


Good attempt at a :fishing: