There's absolutely no way the Daily Mail ran this headline fully aware of the

[Monty92]

reaction that would follow, and also in the full knowledge that 99.9% of anyone seeing the photo would at the very least mentally note the prominence of the legs on display, rendering said response utterly hypocritical.

Nope, no way at all.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/mar/28/daily-mail-legs-it-front-page-sexist

[Burney]

reaction that would follow, and also in the full knowledge that 99.9% of anyone seeing the photo would at the very least mentally note the prominence of the legs on display, rendering said response utterly hypocritical.

Nope, no way at all.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/mar/28/daily-mail-legs-it-front-page-sexist

Of course not. They did it because of Brexit Britain, according to Owen Jones, who appears to have lost his mind today.

Meanwhile, this is fine.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4263578/Justin-Trudeau-s-bottom-goes-viral.html

And this

https://www.theguardian.com/world/commentisfree/2017/mar/02/justin-trudeau-world-leaders-photos

[Pat Vegas]

reaction that would follow, and also in the full knowledge that 99.9% of anyone seeing the photo would at the very least mentally note the prominence of the legs on display, rendering said response utterly hypocritical.

Nope, no way at all.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/mar/28/daily-mail-legs-it-front-page-sexist

Sturgeon imo

[Burney]

Sturgeon imo

Yes. She would get my Barnett Formula alright. Phwoar!

[Billy Goat Sverige]

Of course not. They did it because of Brexit Britain, according to Owen Jones, who appears to have lost his mind today.

Meanwhile, this is fine.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4263578/Justin-Trudeau-s-bottom-goes-viral.html

And this

https://www.theguardian.com/world/commentisfree/2017/mar/02/justin-trudeau-world-leaders-photos

I like his recent project of travelling around the poor areas of Britain to confirm his prejudices. ****er.

[Burney]

I like his recent project of travelling around the poor areas of Britain to confirm his prejudices. ****er.

Yes. You just know that he thought 'Hmmm..that John Harris goes round the country talking to people and everyone says his stuff's good. I'll do the same."

What he forgets, of course, is that John Harris (while I disagree with him on most political issues) is actually a good journalist, who reports what he actually finds and not what he wants to see.