I'm sorry, but when did it become the norm for Tory governments to penalise small

[Burney]

business owners and the self-employed?

I haven't looked, but I imagine Sir C's fewmin. :-(

And what the fück does 'social care' actually fücking mean?

[Sir C]

business owners and the self-employed?

I haven't looked, but I imagine Sir C's fewmin. :-(

And what the fück does 'social care' actually fücking mean?

No fewmin here, b. Don't do self-employed or dividend scamming.

But in answer to your question, it was when those socialists Cameron and Osborne were in charge. :shrug:

It's a poor state of affairs when there isn't an economically conservative party for which one might vote.

[Monty92]

business owners and the self-employed?

I haven't looked, but I imagine Sir C's fewmin. :-(

And what the fück does 'social care' actually fücking mean?

I think people like me, who set myself up as a limited company for no other reason than the tax benefits, can't really have any complaints about those particular loopholes being closed.

[Burney]

No fewmin here, b. Don't do self-employed or dividend scamming.

But in answer to your question, it was when those socialists Cameron and Osborne were in charge. :shrug:

It's a poor state of affairs when there isn't an economically conservative party for which one might vote.

Mrs T's doing about 2,000rpm in her mausoleum as we speak imo.

[Sir C]

Mrs T's doing about 2,000rpm in her mausoleum as we speak imo.

1% of taxpayers paying 27% of the tax take. It's clearly an aggressive, vindictive attack on the wealth creators in society; to what end, who knows?

You'll note further down the board that filth like monty are given free money with which to raise their litters. It's like full-blown communism.

[Monty92]

1% of taxpayers paying 27% of the tax take. It's clearly an aggressive, vindictive attack on the wealth creators in society; to what end, who knows?

You'll note further down the board that filth like monty are given free money with which to raise their litters. It's like full-blown communism.

Actually, the free money I am given is comfortably offset by the additional income tax I end up paying on the money I am able to earn by outsourcing my childcare requirements.

[Burney]

1% of taxpayers paying 27% of the tax take. It's clearly an aggressive, vindictive attack on the wealth creators in society; to what end, who knows?

You'll note further down the board that filth like monty are given free money with which to raise their litters. It's like full-blown communism.

I am peculiarly pïssed off about that. I raised a kid when we got fück all. Now they get childcare allowances and all sorts of shïte.

Cünts don't know they're born.

[Sir C]

Actually, the free money I am given is comfortably offset by the additional income tax I end up paying on the money I am able to earn by outsourcing my childcare requirements.

Justifying your acceptance of charity with spurious numbers doesn't alter the fact that you are not man enough to look after your child without stealing money from me.

[Monty92]

I am peculiarly pïssed off about that. I raised a kid when we got fück all. Now they get childcare allowances and all sorts of shïte.

Cünts don't know they're born.

Excuse me sir, but I suspect that when you raised a kid, your mortgage and childcare costs came in at significantly less than £4,300 a month.

[redgunamo]

No fewmin here, b. Don't do self-employed or dividend scamming.

But in answer to your question, it was when those socialists Cameron and Osborne were in charge. :shrug:

It's a poor state of affairs when there isn't an economically conservative party for which one might vote.

Even the Donald is planning to spend like a teenager from the ghetto who's just got his first Big Soccerball Club contract and has recently converted to Islam along with his local drug baron's daughter girlfriend :-(

[Monty92]

Justifying your acceptance of charity with spurious numbers doesn't alter the fact that you are not man enough to look after your child without stealing money from me.

But don't you understand? The only way to avoid stealing money from you for the upkeep of my children would indirectly mean depriving you of an even greater amount of money through a decrease in the amount of income tax I pay.

[Sir C]

Excuse me sir, but I suspect that when you raised a kid, your mortgage and childcare costs came in at significantly less than £4,300 a month.

So you chose to have a child and a mortgage which you cannot afford.

But that's alright because every other poor **** gets to take up the slack.

Jesus.

[Peter]

business owners and the self-employed?

I haven't looked, but I imagine Sir C's fewmin. :-(

And what the fück does 'social care' actually fücking mean?

That's the Big Society for you....

[Burney]

But don't you understand? The only way to avoid stealing money from you for the upkeep of my children would indirectly mean depriving you of an even greater amount of money through a decrease in the amount of income tax I pay.

Pretty sure nobody made you have kids, did they?

[Monty92]

So you chose to have a child and a mortgage which you cannot afford.

But that's alright because every other poor **** gets to take up the slack.

Jesus.

No, I can afford both. I just keep getting free money chucked at me :shrug:

[Burney]

That's the Big Society for you....

I blame filthy communists like you for this, p.

No offence, like. Peace and love.

[Sir C]

But don't you understand? The only way to avoid stealing money from you for the upkeep of my children would indirectly mean depriving you of an even greater amount of money through a decrease in the amount of income tax I pay.

You pay tax so that common people can go to the doctor every 5 minutes to get signed off work. Your income tax payments are irrelevant to me, because I do not live on charity.

[SWv2]

No, I can afford both. I just keep getting free money chucked at me :shrug:

How much is CB in the UK?

[Monty92]

Pretty sure nobody made you have kids, did they?

I'm not complaining. I'm lucky enough not to need the contributions the government offers me. Whether or not I should therefore accept them is another debate.

[Monty92]

How much is CB in the UK?

I don't get child benefit!!!!!!!!111111111!!!!!!!!

[Sir C]

How much is CB in the UK?

Breaker breaker that's a big 10-4 good buddy.

[Sir C]

I don't get child benefit!!!!!!!!111111111!!!!!!!!

Is it still called Poor Relief?

[SWv2]

I don't get child benefit!!!!!!!!111111111!!!!!!!!

Calm the fúck down big nose.

You appear to get *FREE MONEY* of sorts, call it what you want, amounts to the same thing.

So I repeat my original question, how much do you get per month?

[Burney]

Breaker breaker that's a big 10-4 good buddy.

A childhood hero of yours?

502

[SWv2]

Breaker breaker that's a big 10-4 good buddy.

I used to know a bloke who had one of those, he was a mate of mine, early 80s.

What's your handle etc.

:-\

[Burney]

Is it still called Poor Relief?

Still sounds more fun than Comic Relief. :-(

[Sir C]

A childhood hero of yours?

502

Childhood and indeed current, b.

There's nowt cooler than Burt.

[Burney]

Childhood and indeed current, b.

There's nowt cooler than Burt.

One of the few people who could really rock a moustache imo. There was a point where he was the biggest box office star in Hollywood and - we must assume - couldn't move for fanny.

[redgunamo]

A childhood hero of yours?

502

A hero of everyone's, I should've thought?

Burt Reynolds :love:

[Viva Prat Vegas]

A hero of everyone's, I should've thought?

Burt Reynolds :love:

The original syrup
:wiggy:

[Sir C]

One of the few people who could really rock a moustache imo. There was a point where he was the biggest box office star in Hollywood and - we must assume - couldn't move for fanny.

Oh Lord yes, he was quite the famous swordsman. There is a collection of his replies to fans' letters floating around. Awfully funny.

[Monty92]

Calm the fúck down big nose.

You appear to get *FREE MONEY* of sorts, call it what you want, amounts to the same thing.

So I repeat my original question, how much do you get per month?

I currently don't receive anything as my sprogs are under 3.

At 3, you start getting 30 hours free childcare per week, which is equal to something in the region of £200 a week in London.

And in today's budget, the government have announced they are also going to start offering an additional 2k per year towards childcare for all children under 12. Though I think that may be means-tested, in which case, much like Arsenal in next year's Champions League, I am unlikely to qualify.

So we're talking something like £1,800 per month for a low-earning family with two kids.

[World's End Stella]

You pay tax so that common people can go to the doctor every 5 minutes to get signed off work. Your income tax payments are irrelevant to me, because I do not live on charity.

You paid personally for the roads you drive on? The infrastructure that supplies your house with electricity? The police that protect you? The hospitals and doctors who keep you healthy(ish)?

You're even richer than I thought, Charles. :nod:

[SWv2]

I currently don't receive anything as my sprogs are under 3.

At 3, you start getting 30 hours free childcare per week, which is equal to something in the region of £200 a week in London.

And in today's budget, the government have announced they are also going to start offering an additional 2k per year towards childcare for all children under 12.

So we're talking something like £1,800 per month for a family with two kids.

Jesus, we get €280 per month for the two.

In terms of childcare there is similar incentives, unsure of the specifics, but this is subsidised by Govt for us and paid directly to the registered third party childcare providers - as opposed to money in the pocket.

Of course my own are beyond that stage so it is a complete irrelevance and on that basis one I disagree with.

[Monty92]

Jesus, we get €280 per month for the two.

In terms of childcare there is similar incentives, unsure of the specifics, but this is subsidised by Govt for us and paid directly to the registered third party childcare providers - as opposed to money in the pocket.

Of course my own are beyond that stage so it is a complete irrelevance and on that basis one I disagree with.

Yes, it's paid directly by the government to the childcare provider here too.

[redgunamo]

I currently don't receive anything as my sprogs are under 3.

At 3, you start getting 30 hours free childcare per week, which is equal to something in the region of £200 a week in London.

And in today's budget, the government have announced they are also going to start offering an additional 2k per year towards childcare for all children under 12. Though I think that may be means-tested, in which case, much like Arsenal in next year's Champions League, I am unlikely to qualify.

So we're talking something like £1,800 per month for a low-earning family with two kids.

And after a few years of careful spending and prudent saving, one could afford a halfway decent bottle of Scotch :-|