So the law is making an ass of itself with this absurd superinjunction stuff again.

[Berni]

Everyone with a basic grasp of google can find out who it's about, so what the f**k do judges - or the celebrities themselves - imagine is actually being achieved here?

Do we have a 'right' to know who had a threesome in a paddling pool full of olive oil? Absolutely not.

Is there any way of stopping us finding out who had a threesome in a paddling pool full of olive oil? Not in the longer term, no.

All that is achieved is that the law makes itself look ridiculous and the individuals involved actually end up on the receiving end of more publicity than would otherwise have been the case. The thing is absurd.

[Sir Charlie of Nicholas]

[Classic Jorge]

[Sir Charlie of Nicholas]

he had a fling with a male and female, or

Actually it's none of our business, is it?

[Classic Jorge]

I wonder who was the Lucky Pierre

[IUFG]

would have to get out and traipse through the house to the shower, leaving an oily trail.

[Berni]

However, yes it was. Not sure on the nature of the threesome. Can't imagine women were involved though.

[Berni]

rather unsportingly sold the story.

[Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler]

[Classic Jorge]

[barrybueno]

I would have :-( :old:

[Bergkamp's Brain]

do we think she was extra virgin?

Ugly as f*ck, though

[Mo Britain less Europe]