PDA

View Full Version : hehe Downing St releasing four statements in a day on Dave's offshore adventures



Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 09:06 AM
Downing Street has said David Cameron dun know nuffink baht any offshore funds.

Downing Street has said David Cameron does not benefit from offshore funds.

Downing Street has said David Cameron, his wife and children do not benefit from offshore funds.

Downing Street has said David Cameron, his wife and children do not benefit from offshore funds and neither will they in the future.

Luis Anaconda
04-06-2016, 09:14 AM
You are very quick to pick up any inaccuracy in the criticism of the Blessed Jeremy - should you not allow those you don't like the same courtesy. Even if they are pigf**kers?

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 09:17 AM
I think it's fair to say the boy's having a bit of a torrid time of it at the moment. It's almost as if the Lib Dems had a point after all.

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
04-06-2016, 09:19 AM
The potential issue was forced necrophiliac porcine oral sodomy. A small, but important distinction, I think you'll agree.

Ashberto
04-06-2016, 09:22 AM
Pigf**ker it shall be imo :nod:

IUFG
04-06-2016, 09:22 AM
nobody who wears a shell suit is fit to run a country

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
04-06-2016, 09:23 AM
I'm disappointed in you, I confess.

Luis Anaconda
04-06-2016, 09:25 AM
J - that should read even if they are necrophiliac porcine oral sodomisers

Berni
04-06-2016, 09:25 AM
God knows what we might have done to Derek if there hadn't been ladies present. :-(

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 09:25 AM
I have to say, Jeremy isnt a c**t, he's a very nice man.

That said, it's almost a King Ralph-esque unlikely rise to power.

Berni
04-06-2016, 09:26 AM

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 09:26 AM
Even if he is from, or basically owns, the rival turf of Belize

Berni
04-06-2016, 09:27 AM

IUFG
04-06-2016, 09:29 AM

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 09:30 AM
Mind you, it's very puzzling that the institution you chose was the tory party.

It would indicate, in my mind at least, that they were hammering the phones trying to find friendly faces who'd seen the data and could tell them precisely what was and what wasnt in it.

I do like the name of Papa's company though, Blairmore :hehe:

Indeed

Luis Anaconda
04-06-2016, 09:32 AM

Berni
04-06-2016, 09:36 AM
aspersions, tries to damn by association, but makes no meaningful contact.

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 09:37 AM
It's less a statement, more a minute-by-minute match report

Mo Britain less Europe
04-06-2016, 09:45 AM
between tax evasion and tax avoidance.

Berni
04-06-2016, 09:46 AM
mudslinging and nothing's stuck. :shrug:

On the plus side, it may damage the Remain cause yet further :cloud9:

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 09:50 AM

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 09:51 AM
Blairmore havent paid a penny of tax in the UK for the entirity of his premiership. A premiership in which he's pledged to come down hard on people avoiding paying tax by using secret overseas accounts.

Berni
04-06-2016, 10:09 AM

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 10:10 AM

Berni
04-06-2016, 10:13 AM

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 10:15 AM
And also, you know that legally knowing and actually knowing are two different things.

Berni
04-06-2016, 10:16 AM
based on your prejudices - also known as '*******s'.

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 10:18 AM
All we seem to know is that the company has successfully avoided paying UK tax for the last seven years.

You have to admit, even if you are comfortable with people getting obscenely rich, it doesnt look great.

Berni
04-06-2016, 10:24 AM
His father ran this fund legally and your 'it doesn't look great' is about as serious as the allegations get. It's a fuss about f**k all.

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 10:27 AM
Add that to the fact all of these party donors details are coming out now too. I mean, to the untrained eye, it could look like the party are getting kickbacks from the money made by their donors and using it to fund their election campaigns.

Berni
04-06-2016, 10:38 AM
the party. As long as the money is not illegal, there is no issue. Calling those monies 'kickbacks' is simply misleading, sensationalist nonsense.

Four statements in a day happens because it's pretty clear the PM didn't know anything about this, which as I say, means he's not guilty of any deliberate wrongdoing. It would be much more suspicious if he had a ready-made, all-encompassing explanation for the whole thing, since that would suggest he was ready for it.

Mo Britain less Europe
04-06-2016, 10:40 AM

Classic Jorge
04-06-2016, 10:40 AM
And nobody knew about the Panama Papers, which explains the lack of preparation.

redgunamo
04-06-2016, 10:47 AM