PDA

View Full Version : Joan Bakewell - wrong to suggest that anorexia is narcissistic?



Ashberto
03-15-2016, 03:10 PM

Classic Jorge
03-15-2016, 03:12 PM
Mind you, back in the day you definitely would

http://ireneogrizek.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/p01jwqdn.jpg

redgunamo
03-15-2016, 03:14 PM

Luis Anaconda
03-15-2016, 03:19 PM
Brendan O'Neil banging on about twitch hunts. Jesus, he writes some ****e

Monty91
03-15-2016, 03:37 PM
vanity, then yes she's wrong.

If she was talking about narcissism as a psychological condition, then of course she's correct to suggest there's a strong correlation.

Classic Jorge
03-15-2016, 03:42 PM
Now I feel bad about about just concentrating on the "yeh but she woz well fit back in the day" angle.

But she was

Monty91
03-15-2016, 03:42 PM
from the Swinging Sixties, does it?

A risque charity calendar would do. I’m really not fussy.

Classic Jorge
03-15-2016, 03:43 PM
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/fe/02/89/fe0289ff1eb7c55e14155c270f5ad013.jpg

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01298/PF-Joan3_1298149c.jpg

Monty91
03-15-2016, 03:54 PM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:05 PM
The socialists have spent 70 years persuading us that it's OK to be weak if you just make up an excuse. So we end up with allergies, asthma and gluten intolerance. Anorexia and transgendernonsense and addictions which simply aren't addictions.

Load of ****o rubbish, designed to weaken our society and bring it to its knees.

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 04:06 PM
but anorexia is presumably more complicated than just vanity. I think she has a point, particularly in pointing out that you don't find anorexia in refugee camps. Assuming that the research indicated a lack of said condition in said circumstances.

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:07 PM
They always existed but we were ignorant of them.

People did not always die of cancer, they just died. But they did die of cancer.

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 04:08 PM
http://img.news.sina.com/sports/p/2013/0227/U158P5029T2D566338F28DT20130228144048.jpg

Luis Anaconda
03-15-2016, 04:13 PM
"So instead ofengaging [/b] Bakewell in debate, her critics slammed and shamed her, accusing her of ‘stigmatising’ sick young women, spreading ‘dangerous opinions’ and making life harder for ‘those struggling’ with the disease. They pathologised her words, turning them from mere opinions into physically dangerous things, liable to hurt minds and damage bodies – just as every censor in history has decreed that some thoughts are so toxic to the human spirit that they must be squished. "
O'Neil

"I spent much of the day engaging with these people and others, responding directly to their concerns."
Her own words

Monty91
03-15-2016, 04:15 PM
mental illness. Surely only a cretin would believe that mental illness is only ever the result of a genetic inheritance.

Perhaps some people in Syria are predisposed to developing anorexia, but the environmental and cultural conditions in which they live mean it never germinates.

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:21 PM
that you have something wrong with you (and clearly any chap who wants to go around in a frock and have his danglies removed has something seriously f**king wrong with them), but that you don't.

And then there is what follows when we are all told we should all simply accept that and pretend the outcome is marvellous rather than going 'No, but you're f**king mental, aren't you? We feel sorry for you and everything, but you do have to admit that you are seriously f**ked in the head."

I don't mind people being mental. It's being asked to pretend they're not that bothers me.

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 04:23 PM
Of course I have no idea whether her opinion has genuinely changed or whether she said that to quell the reaction directed at her, but I think his point is valid, that whether or not she is right in her opinion, the "you can't say that" reaction to such opinions creates a censorious atmosphere that is contrary to the spirit of reasoned debate and discussion.

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 04:25 PM
I'm fairly sure, from my family experience anyway, that certain conditions that might in some quarters be described as 'mental ilness' are hereditary.

Monty91
03-15-2016, 04:29 PM
said yourself, it is still classified as a mental illness and the stringent counselling and psychological tests applied to anyone wanting surgery are, if anything, to confirm their desire is so deep-rooted it is the only solution. In other words, that they really are mental enough to want to go through with this.

Monty91
03-15-2016, 04:31 PM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:33 PM
Like the so-called 'peanut allergy'.

Utter nonsense.

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 04:33 PM

Luis Anaconda
03-15-2016, 04:34 PM
censorious atmosphere exists can be greatly exaggerated to prove a point by people such O'Neill (another example, he talks of her being forced to leave Twitter, she was off it for all of a day). Amazing how many of these "Twitter storms" just follow the formula: person says something, people disagree, other people agree, life moves on. Kinda like free speech really.

and ftr - I would go along with Jorge and Monty's opinion pretty much

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:35 PM
mentally ill by pretending they're not mentally ill. I have a problem with that. We don't do it in any other areas of mental illness, do we? We don't tell anorexics that they're fat and we don't tell paranoid schizophrenics that actually, yes, God is talking to them through their neighbour's dog. We treat them with drugs and counselling to disabuse them of their mentalness. We certainly don't put them on the front of Vanity Fair and reinforce their delusion, ffs!

And yet with transgenders we are all expected to collude in the delusions of the mentally ill. That is seriously f**king insane.

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:36 PM
Trust me pal.

f**king weirdos the lot of them.

I have no allergies, naturally.

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:37 PM
This was distressing as, with one thing or another, it meant I didn't get my hole that evening. :-(

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 04:37 PM
I don't think we can dismiss all allergies, just because they are new. We can't rule out the possibility of new allergies emerging since the international communist conspiracy has been sapping and impurifying our precious bodily fluids.

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:38 PM
This ia an honest, decent, manly fear.

Also milk and rhubarb.

Classic Jorge
03-15-2016, 04:38 PM

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 04:38 PM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:39 PM
having been on one all weekend. I thought everyone knew that?

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 04:39 PM

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:40 PM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:40 PM
But especially cotton wool.

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:41 PM

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:41 PM
Queen also.

:-(

Herbette Chapman - aged 15
03-15-2016, 04:41 PM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:41 PM
Prawn, pork or chicken, I treat them all equally. Chuck thon fluorescent gloop all over them and we're good to go.

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:41 PM
Essentially you are a queer.

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:42 PM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:42 PM
Don't be fooled.

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:42 PM
Just dry them and get on with it.

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:43 PM
The squeaking would be awful.

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:43 PM

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 04:43 PM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:43 PM
My testes have just retreated back into my gizzards :-(

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:44 PM
And the way she started wheezing and insisting I called an ambulance.

Anything to get out of sex with me, I suppose :rolleyes:

Herbette Chapman - aged 15
03-15-2016, 04:45 PM
the middle classes use when they can't be arsed to teach their kids to read* - dyslexia.

*No it's not the feckin schools job, it's your job.

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:45 PM
In all respects except the 'sex with men' part, I find myself homosexualer with each passing day.

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:46 PM
For years and years as a child I was subjected to it.

Monty91
03-15-2016, 04:46 PM
over-compensating for the fact that a lot of unpleasant people discriminate against transgenders.

Just like when someone’s missus is extra nice to people to compensate for their partner being a c**t.

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:46 PM

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:46 PM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:47 PM

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:47 PM
My rhubarb would be a different thing altogether. :nod:

Basically what you do is use an unholy amount of sugar - otherwise it's totally f**king inedible to the point of toxicity imo.

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:49 PM
We're all in favour of pooves now over here.

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:50 PM
You'd be able to try white wine and appreciate colours.

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:50 PM
On the plus side, it got me out of having to pay for the meal :thumbup:

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:50 PM

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:50 PM
Essentially the whole concept of a rhubarb crumble is the dessert equivalent of having a packet of Werthers Originals in the glove compartment of your car.

Herbette Chapman - aged 15
03-15-2016, 04:52 PM

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-15-2016, 04:53 PM
The concept of drinking white wine is enough to put any man off having another man’s cock shoved up his ring.

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:53 PM
For instance, if a broadcaster on the BBC tonight said that transgender people are mentally ill, would he/she have a job in the morning? Would a politician dare say such a thing? Or a public servant? Of course not. Thus is the rigid orthodoxy of a lie built and reinforced.

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-15-2016, 04:53 PM

Berni
03-15-2016, 04:57 PM
I did know a chap who used to eat it raw sprinkled with sugar - much as one might sprinkle celery with salt. He was insane, obviously,

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 05:01 PM
then, well, she's not coming from there any longer if her apology for suggesting such a thing is genuine, and not 'forced' by the suggestions that she was harming people (as she was accused of on twitter) by expressing it.

In other words - If she has changed her mind as a result of discussions following her comments, then this can be seen as the outcome of a healthy exchange of opinions, as you suggest. If she is pretending to take the new position though, to escape the opprobium, than that would imply a censorship imposed via a twitter-storm.

Monty91
03-15-2016, 05:02 PM
I read the transcript of the link you posted on the Guardian recently about the politician speaking in Parliament about discrimination against men in the criminal justice system.

There you had the perfect example of someone speaking out against the “orthodoxy” but doing so in a balanced and reasonable way and with the facts to back up what he was saying.

I don’t believe anyone called for him to be sacked. On the contrary, his opponents were reduced to acknowledging the validity of his argument.

Berni
03-15-2016, 05:10 PM
the contrary. Indeed, his opponents in the committee still did not accept his point despite the evidence because the orthodoxy was so deeply ingrained that it could never and can never be gainsayed. If anything, I would argue that that is a depressing example of just how pernicious polite lies can be when they calcify into orthodoxies.

Besides, you're ignoring the context. No broadcaster is going to dare say any such thing because they know they'd be crucified for it. A politician in a subcommittee nobody watches is a different thing.

Monty91
03-15-2016, 05:27 PM
about transgenders beyond wanting to encourage people not to be c**ts to them.

That’s because most people consider their decision a lifestyle choice brought on by a psychological imperative, and the “orthodoxy” (which I believe you agree with) is that if someone’s lifestyle is legal and doesn’t impinge on other people, then they can do what they want.

redgunamo
03-15-2016, 10:24 PM

Ashberto
03-15-2016, 11:35 PM