PDA

View Full Version : So let me get this straight, if Charlie is right, the following scenario is offside:



Monty91
03-18-2015, 10:55 AM
Player A and B are attackers. Player C is a defender.

Player A passes the ball forward to Player B who is onside due to the position of Player C.

Player C moves to intercept the pass, at which point Player B has strayed behind Player C. Player C scuffs his interception and the ball spins back into the path of Player B who has a clear run on goal.

Do you mean to tell me that in this instance, the rules state that Player B is offside??????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????? ????????????????????????????????????????

Or am I being dumb?

Billy Goat Sverige
03-18-2015, 10:59 AM
play the ball and should mean player b is onside. Why should a defender be compensated for being ****?

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-18-2015, 11:00 AM

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:01 AM

Billy Goat Sverige
03-18-2015, 11:01 AM
http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/administration/ 02/10/67/39/circularno.1362-amendmentstothelawsofthegame-201 3-2014_neutral.pdf (http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/administration/02/10/67/39/circularno.1362-amendmentstothelawsofthegame-2013-2014_neutral.pdf)

Classic Jorge
03-18-2015, 11:02 AM

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-18-2015, 11:02 AM
Player B is onside because he was when the pass was made by his team mate, the defender has just made a mistake.

I think.

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:04 AM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-18-2015, 11:04 AM
I would say that Clive is right about the law, but wrong to apply it to the situation last night.

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:05 AM

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-18-2015, 11:05 AM
I'm not having this new Clive Rule one bit.

Billy Goat Sverige
03-18-2015, 11:05 AM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-18-2015, 11:06 AM
We have now established that such a law exists. Clive just applied it incorrectly.

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:06 AM
What does Player C have to do with this scenario?

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:08 AM
in the season, Sanzhez would have been offside? :hehe:

Berni
03-18-2015, 11:08 AM

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:09 AM

Classic Jorge
03-18-2015, 11:09 AM
It'll stop soon, Inshallan

Pokster
03-18-2015, 11:10 AM
so no matter what happens after that he is still onside unless player A touches the ball again and it goes forward.

Last night he was given offisde because
a) the lino thought it was an Arsenal player that headed it
b) the lino thought he was offside when the free kick was taken.

It's not hard

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:11 AM

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-18-2015, 11:11 AM
In your original scenario player B was onside when the final pass from a team mate was made.

Given no further interaction from a team mate - the only other person who touches the ball in the interim is C, a defender - I cannot understand how a previous onside position then becomes an offside position.

Berni
03-18-2015, 11:12 AM

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
03-18-2015, 11:12 AM

Classic Jorge
03-18-2015, 11:13 AM

Pokster
03-18-2015, 11:13 AM
This is how it works

Player A try's to play a through ball to player B who is offside, the ball is intercepted by player C (so player B hasn't attempted to play the ball so can't be given offside), player C then decides to play a pass whcih player B intercepts and scores from. Player B isn't offside because player C has played a deliberate pass

Last night was a red herring

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-18-2015, 11:14 AM
Go play with the alphabet blocks for a while or something.

Berni
03-18-2015, 11:14 AM
Admiral Allan Hugh Akhbar.

http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20081118162020/starwars/images/f/fb/Ackbar_HS.jpg

Billy Goat Sverige
03-18-2015, 11:15 AM

Luis Anaconda
03-18-2015, 11:15 AM

Pokster
03-18-2015, 11:16 AM

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:16 AM

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:20 AM

redgunamo
03-18-2015, 11:23 AM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-18-2015, 11:25 AM
Had he inadvertantly deflected the ball, Koscielny would have been offside.

Hence, Clive was right, but wrong.

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:34 AM
No, just no.

This cannot be true.

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-18-2015, 11:37 AM
So, by definition, it's true.

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:41 AM
from an attacker, falling over, allowing a previously onside attacker to run pick up he ball and score being offside?

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-18-2015, 11:45 AM
If, in the fraction of a second between this deliberate touch and the indvertant touch occasioned by the falling over, the attcker runs into an offside position, then he will, indeed, be offside.

Monty91
03-18-2015, 11:50 AM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
03-18-2015, 11:50 AM

Pokster
03-18-2015, 12:00 PM
I have explained it twice FFS

Bergkamp's Brain
03-18-2015, 12:48 PM
Gaining an advantage by being in that position means

1) A player playing a ball that rebounds to him off a post or crossbar, having previously been in an offside position

2) A player playing a ball that rebounds to him off an opponnent, having previously been in an offside position

I cannot find any other place where the deliberate or not a deliberate touch by an opponent makes any difference.

All I can conclude is that Clive was being a total scum sucker