PDA

View Full Version : Boyhood is two and three quarter hours I'll never get back. Yawn



Berni
01-27-2015, 07:36 AM
Actually, that's not quite true, since I went to bed rather than bother with the last 40 minutes of meandering, inconsequential tedium.

Avoid.

71 Guns - channeling the spirit of Mr Hat
01-27-2015, 08:34 AM
Could you now watch Birdman & let me know what you think of that? Tia :thumbup:

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
01-27-2015, 08:57 AM
Maybe I'll send it back.

Berni
01-27-2015, 09:12 AM
endlessly. Tried to watch Before Sunrise a while back and had to turn it off as the smug hipsters were causing me to reach for my revolver.

I will make an exception for School of Rock, which is excellent and Dazed and Confused, which is at least entertaining.

Otherwise, he's ****.

Red N White Army
01-27-2015, 09:39 AM
Whatsoever, there is something I quite like about that. Not much escapism though.

Classic Jorge
01-27-2015, 09:48 AM
Still, at least the fact you hold School of Rock up as some sort of example invalidates any points you make.

Slacker, Dazed and Confused, seminal films of the 90s imo

I guess you're just unhappy about your unsympathetic portrayal in your biopic, Bernie.

Berni
01-27-2015, 09:53 AM
Seminal he may be. Doesn't mean that his influence is a good one, though. His films are full of people with nothing to say saying it at great and tedious length.

Classic Jorge
01-27-2015, 09:57 AM
I like the character studies, the tableau approach and I don't think films are there just to be entertaining. If you want "entertaining" just watch some mindless blockbusters where huge robots kick **** out of each other.

I like Linklater, I'm pleased that he's back trying to do interesting stuff.

Berni
01-27-2015, 09:57 AM
and undramatic series of events. I don't need to watch a film to do that.

Berni
01-27-2015, 10:00 AM
That's phenomenally reductive and f**kwitted, j. You're better than that.

Luis Anaconda
01-27-2015, 10:01 AM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
01-27-2015, 10:03 AM
That makes you share a philosophy with a Stoke City manager of the 1970s. (Whose name I can't now recall)

Luis Anaconda
01-27-2015, 10:05 AM
actually Alan Durban

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
01-27-2015, 10:08 AM
Duller than a George Graham team.

Classic Jorge
01-27-2015, 10:11 AM
Thought provoking, moving, interesting, shocking, I'm fine with all these things which aren't entertainment

Berni
01-27-2015, 10:11 AM
If you're bored stiff, it's your fault because you're too stupid to get it.

Classic Jorge
01-27-2015, 10:12 AM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
01-27-2015, 10:13 AM
What's a film got to do with spunk, for God's sake?

Berni
01-27-2015, 10:17 AM
I can't help it if your definition of entertainment is so narrow that it only encompasses CGI robots hitting each other, j.

Berni
01-27-2015, 10:21 AM
He knows what people want.

For the record, I don't agree with all this Scorcese worship. I am uncomfortable with his faintly nauseating worship of one-dimensional psychopathic characters. However, he knows how to entertain.

Berni
01-27-2015, 10:23 AM

Sir Charlie of Nicholas
01-27-2015, 10:25 AM
Fair enough then.

Classic Jorge
01-27-2015, 10:27 AM
It's all those other things I mentioned, particularly seminal

Berni
01-27-2015, 10:32 AM
Boyhood is neither, but we'll let that go.

Classic Jorge
01-27-2015, 10:40 AM

Jake
01-27-2015, 10:42 AM

Berni
01-27-2015, 10:46 AM

Jake
01-27-2015, 10:48 AM
It may not be a story to your taste, but it's a story.

Berni
01-27-2015, 10:51 AM

Jake
01-27-2015, 10:55 AM
Or as rational people refer to it, a story.

Berni
01-27-2015, 11:03 AM
drama because they think it makes them cleverer and better than other people is why so many godawful, overlong films with no plot and pisspoor scripts get made these days. There's no respect for the discipline of good craft these days. Everyone prefers to **** on about 'art' as though that were in some way better. Idiots.

Billy Goat Sverige
01-27-2015, 11:06 AM

Jake
01-27-2015, 11:10 AM
Unfortunately for you, the film world's "lax" definitions of plot, story, drama or whatever you want to name clearly don't adhere to your more linear definitions and structures.

I fear you were born in the wrong generation b. By several generations.

Berni
01-27-2015, 11:18 AM
Actually, the rise in genuinely terrible, undisciplined and ultimately self-indulgent crap films started with the idea of the auteur (when in doubt, blame the French) and got infinitely worse in the states in the 70s as the studios lost their iron grip on directors and the tedious c**ts started being allowed the freedom to bore the arses off everyone without a studio boss quite rightly telling them to cut it by an hour.

Of course, this period created some great movies, but it also created this awful and damaging idea of the director as artist, which has served to punish cinemagoers ever since.

Jake
01-27-2015, 11:22 AM
Look b, you know your definitions of entertainment in film are absolute rubbish. Accept it.

Berni
01-27-2015, 11:25 AM
somehow morally edifying. It's not. It's just bad film making.

Jake
01-27-2015, 11:28 AM
Don't hate me because I'm able to find entertainment where the layman can only find the mundane.

Berni
01-27-2015, 11:29 AM
admit you don't for fear of being thought stupid. We all go through this stage, j, don't worry. You grow out of it and realise life's too f**king short.

Jake
01-27-2015, 11:41 AM
I just find it hard to see how you can be so objective about this and bracket so many films under your bizarre definitions. I hate Clerks but I love Slacker. Gummo is **** but Withnail & I is great. It's nothing to do with intellectual pretensions. It's whether the film's entertainment value is entertaining to you.