At least we know we dont need cesc now

[o2be a gooner]

[Classic Jorge]

Or, for that matter, that spending 30M+ on yet another attacking midfielder would have made addressing those issues any easier.

[barrybueno]

Or was that your point :sherlock:

[Classic Jorge]

In fairness to people like SOLTARD and 7, at least their whinings are based in some logic.

This fellow just seems to be perpetually angry at everything. I suspect he gets wound up by his own choice of y-fronts every time he goes to the toilet.

[R.C. Celebrating the return of Trophies]

And only a socialist would look at Cesc and say no, especially for the dubious reasoning of protecting the current crop from strong competition for a start.

If Cesc had been welcomed back, we would be a much stronger team.
How in any world is that a bad thing?

Also Chelsea wouldn't be enjoying his excellence, an aside yes, but one that we as fans can take some pleasure in.

[Classic Jorge]

And surely a capitalist would have a keener idea that if you spend 30m where it isn't so badly needed then you won't have that 30m to spend in a place where it is.

I can understand the sentimental attachment to Cesc, I don't share it though.

[Bergkamp's Brain]

Remember how unhappy soltard was when we were winning stuff. He is positively beaming now.

[Peter]

Anything. He didnt solve the problems then, he wouldnt have done now.

It might not be a good reason not to buy him. The point is that it is ridiculous to keep bringing it up after every bad result, particulsrly when those bad results were caused by the issues that his signing wouldnt have changed.

[Peter]

By **** defending and an inability to do the ugly stuff.

Beautiful losers, to quote leonard cohen. :-)

[Bergkamp's Brain]

Imo, he is better than each and every one of the midfielders that we currently have. We would have needed to unload one of the current crop to get him in, though.

[Peter]

We do not lack technical, creative quality. We have loads of it, possibly too much in the squad.

Think of a balance of qualities in a squad and look at those we might lack. Does cesc possess any of them?

No is the answer. Great player and we could signed him. Equally we could have signed a quality centre half and a disciplined midfielder with pace and a tactical brain. We could work more on our shape in training.

Or we could have gone after di maria, or messi..

[o2be a gooner]

wengers approach to that is the same as his approach to cesc.. and even not gettign a backup striker, (he wouldnt have if girioud stayed fit, which is ridiculous)

why wont you admit he is wrong, and ridiuclous???

[Bergkamp's Brain]

Just that he is, imo, better than what we have in the same playing position. I personally think we should have off loaded one of those and brought Cesc back.

Of course, our major problems are at the back and just in front of the back four. Solving that was the priority and Wenger failed to do it. Discussing Cesc is nothing to do with that. That appears to be a major Wenger f**k up.

[Supermac1976]

:hehe:

[Peter]

[SOLMAN(read by millions)]

[SOLMAN(read by millions)]