Hello just a one off post on scotland

[modd]

Hi just one off post so don,t worry . I just had to say something on scotland independence vote

The scots won,t vote for independence. This idea it be close is media trying to get more people to watch its live coverage on the night. It won,t be close.

Scots won,t vote independence because not enough of them will want to take the risk with their economy and their futures.

I don,t care if they stay or go to be honest but Snp have been facing a losing battle from the start. here are the reasons
(a) 95% of the media are against independence so their druming up fear stories all week. that will play a major part anyway.
(b) three main english political parties against independence
(c) major world leaders and buisnes leaders are against it
(D) many don,t like alex samond.



This idea it be close on the night is laughable. it be a easy no win. betfair have paid out on a no win with ease. All the bookies point to a easy no win.

Thats it.

[Pokster]

the close vote. You mention this is media outlets trying to get extra coverage, this doesn't hold true, the Polls are by independent organisations, the reason i believe it will be clearer than expected is that some of the likely NO voters have said undecided at this time but will use caution when they finally vote so making it about 60:40 imho

[Classic Jorge]

I juts hope they get a visit from the president milt romany

[modd]

polls. I think that many no voters don,t want to come out to pollsters so the vote looks closer then in reality it be on the night.

But i agree with your view that many of the so called yet to decide voters will vote no. I would say it be 60% to 40% at least.

The issue is will westminster give scots the increased powers they promised.

[Sir Charlie of Nicholas]

:rubshands:

[modd]

say no. it be a easy no win jorge.

[modd]

independent but won,t happen in million years with all bookies pointing out no, anti media coverage to no vote.

Like i said good their having the vote but scots won,t take the risk.

[Brentwood]

Would cost them far more in advertising than the amount they have to pay out

[Classic Jorge]

...will probably ensure a win, it's making me want to vote Yes.

[Sir Charlie of Nicholas]

The likes of you and your welfare-addicted chums could all go and live in Commissar Salmond's People's Paradise and leave is rich, old white folks to get on with it :thumbup:

[Classic Jorge]

Also, it's probably worth pointing out that our skag-borthering, dole-friendly, deep-fried ginger chums north of the wall actually have a higher per-capita GDP than us.

[Sir Charlie of Nicholas]

Public sector 'jobs' available = 75,000

:shrug:

[Classic Jorge]

[Berni]

that will have most of England up in arms in a few years' time.

[modd]

most will vote no as they won,t want to take a risk with their ecnomey.

In end be brave fight by the yes side but they deep down will lose big on the night.

[Classic Jorge]

I mean, they did invent economics, after all.

[modd]

once betting on united winning league in 2012 showed.

But fact that every bookie said no will win just sums it up. It be a easy no win as most of undecideds will go their win.

no is winning in pretty much every poll, bookies all say it be no. unless this is 1992 election its pretty easy to say no will win.

[modd]

who tend to be more cautrious in their vote will go to no side.

In the end when all the bookies say it be no, when all the polls say it be no then you can see where this is heading.

[modd]

powers in the end to keep everyone happy.

[Pokster]

[Berni]

Smile at us. Pay us. Pass us. But do not quite forget."

[barrybueno]

present. Next up Wales and Ireland :****er: