So should we be offering Sagna £120k a week?

[Monty91]

[Nicosia Gooner]

[Luis Anaconda]

of bonus payments etc within his contract, other financial limitations and liabilities that the club has or many other factors that I would need to make an informed decision. In fact, you'd have to be a moron to offer an opinion knowing so little about a subject

[Monty91]

but I suspect that, no, we shouldn't.

[Monty91]

[Luis Anaconda]

[Pat Vegas]

he finshed on a high. we can find somebody to replace him who though will cost money to buy will be for the future.

[Peter]

And on the overall impact of the offer on the squad.

Would seem strenge for us to question their informed decision with acces to so little information.

We would almost be questioning wenger

[Peter]

[PSRB]

[Ashberto]

of seeing quality full-backs going to *** free moneyed *** rivals to advance their interests.

[Peter]

[Monty91]

I nailed my colours to the "We shouldn't be paying right backs that kind of money" mast a couple of weeks ago.

[Billy Goat Sverige]

Highest paid player in our squard?

No.

[Monty91]

the real heavyweights - Man City, Chelsea, Man Utd and Barcelona.

It wasn't so long ago we were losing them to the likes of AC Milan and Balenthia.

[Luis Anaconda]

[Monty91]

[Peter]

[Mack]

[Jake]

[Peter]

[Norn Iron]

There seemed to be a reluctance to pay Walcott £90k a week so there's little or no chance of Sagna getting £120k. Good luck to him if he can get it elsewhere.

[Monty91]

what hope do we have? :-(

[Peter]

[redgunamo]