A very "sophisticated" strategy using tax dollars

[Chief Arrowhead]

you all are missing the most cringeworthy ad campaign ever.. and it's being perpetrated by the Obama government. The health plan boils down to getting young people to pay well over what is necessary in order to have the 'olds' covered. Seems the youngsters, who don't have jobs anyway thanks to this crap economy, ain't biting. So it's time to get Obamas vaunted marketing machine in gear. Check out some of these ads. They border from the silly, to the inane to the disgusting.

My tax dollars at work!

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/obama-admin-trots-out-angry- mom-push-obamacare (http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/obama-admin-trots-out-angry-mom-push-obamacare)

[Berni]

Honestly, will you people stop being so bloody parochial?

[Classic Jorge]

Presumably thats more 911 Truther, Birther Truth truth than your actual not-bat****-insane truth.

Terrible, terrible ads though. American creative always feels so rudimentary

[Ashberto]

Anyway, for the West to suddenly discover the importance of sovereignty and the wrongness of intervention is laughable, after its own conduct over the last 20 years.

[Sir Charlie of Nicholas]

We used to actively engage in the slave trade. Are you suggesting that we should, as a result, stand by whilst other countries buy, sell or utilise slave labour?

We used to burn witches at the stake. Are we therefore unable to complain if we notice someone else burning cat-loving women?

Furthermore, if you are offended by our recent attitude towards sovereignty, would your efforts not be better placed being offended by Russia's attitude to sovereignty, rather than ignoring the issue in favour of jumping up and down to point out our hypocrisy?

[Classic Jorge]

Just like he was vocal about Iraq and Afghanistan. Definitely more so than some of the people feigning outrage at Putin are now anyway.

[Sir Charlie of Nicholas]

[Ashberto]

over the last few years? Surely not.

A key thing here - does one support the concept of sovereignty or not? I do, have done consistently, and therefore do not/would not agree with a Russian intervention. If Britain should respect soveriegnty, so should Russia. If Russia should, so should Britain.

I see nothing strange in consistently applying a principle, particularly as the West has already intervened in the situation there to the point of diplomatically and financially backing a coup of a democratically elected government.

[redgunamo]

aren't they?

At least, our lives are. Therefore one must always remain flexible.

[Chief Arrowhead]

and then consider that they are counting on these "kids" to foot the bill so that his socialist utopia can get off the ground.

It's been one lie after another. Is this any way to "fundamentally transform" a country? Lies, deceit and condescension?