PDA

View Full Version : John Henry admits Suarez did have a release clause of 40m, lied to the player and hoped for the best



CrossGun
03-02-2014, 03:06 PM
What are they smokin over there?

Nicosia Gooner
03-02-2014, 03:20 PM

CrossGun
03-02-2014, 03:38 PM
http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/liverpools-john-henry-admi ts-luis-suarez-had-a-40m-buyout-clause-gambled-on-arsenal-no t-taking-lfc-to-court/ (http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/liverpools-john-henry-admits-luis-suarez-had-a-40m-buyout-clause-gambled-on-arsenal-not-taking-lfc-to-court/)

pjlincs
03-02-2014, 03:43 PM

CrossGun
03-02-2014, 03:50 PM

LadyG -keeping the spirit of the unbeatables alive
03-02-2014, 03:53 PM
The key question should be given what we now know about the clause and John Henry's stance, what are the thoughts of People who were deeply offended buy the way the Arsenal handled matters?

Do they think we should have called his bluff and taken the matter to court especially as Surez's team didn't do anything?

LadyG -keeping the spirit of the unbeatables alive
03-02-2014, 03:56 PM
His team didn't threaten to take Liverpool to court, so was it our responsibility to initiate proceedings?

delboy ceg
03-02-2014, 04:01 PM
I think any action would have to come from the players side

No doubt many on here will use it to lambast Arsenal and call Wenger a c**t

Deleted Account
03-02-2014, 04:09 PM

CrossGun
03-02-2014, 04:14 PM
Guardiola should have taken it to tribunal.

SOLMAN(read by millions)
03-02-2014, 04:45 PM

Ashberto
03-02-2014, 04:57 PM
the shop £50?

redgunamo
03-02-2014, 05:33 PM
in your favour if there's no fixed price.

Just ask young Mesut.

Nicosia Gooner
03-02-2014, 06:08 PM
have offered more? Its absolute nonsense to suggest otherwise and you are only saying that on hindsight, but you are still wrong, very wrong

Nicosia Gooner
03-02-2014, 06:09 PM

The Tony
03-02-2014, 06:59 PM

Nicosia Gooner
03-02-2014, 07:36 PM