PDA

View Full Version : I think clarification is required



Dorset Gooner
08-29-2013, 03:55 PM
1. My point was that when we went to war in Iraq in 2003 it was based on evidence that WMD existed. This was proven to be false.
2. There is strong evidence to suggest that Assad has used chemical weapons which are illegal. It is not 100% & never will be. I agree that we should wait for the UN findings
3. The Uk goverment & France & the US & others are not proposing a war. It is different to Iraq where they were trying to remove a dictator.
4. Yes my knowledge is based on media reports. If anyone else can tell me what they use I'd be delighted to hear.
5. Two optons, do nothing & send out a message that it is ok to use these weapons or take a united action.
Fair enough if people think nothing should be done, my view is different to this.
In my ideal world we wouldn't have conflict but it is not down to some cider head in Dorset I'm afraid.
xxx

Mo Britain less Europe
08-29-2013, 03:57 PM

Ears are alight
08-29-2013, 03:57 PM

Dorset Gooner
08-29-2013, 03:57 PM

Pat Vegas
08-29-2013, 03:57 PM

Pat Vegas
08-29-2013, 03:58 PM

Dorset Gooner
08-29-2013, 03:58 PM

Classic Jorge
08-29-2013, 04:02 PM
In this case White Phosphorus and DU.

Are we saying that one type of banned weapon is OK but others arent? I'm confused.

Snin
08-29-2013, 04:05 PM
is corrwect? esp as they all sided with WMD's etc and are bent shysters so also try robert fisk, RT - russian times,look at syria on newsnow.co.uk , check press tv , look at some stories on www.whatreallyhappened.com the syria ones are very interesting..then start to decide.. i read from the above thru to sun,star and teleghraph..get a broader view imo

Dorset Gooner
08-29-2013, 04:07 PM
ask Jorge he has ALL of the answers

redgunamo
08-29-2013, 04:09 PM

Dorset Gooner
08-29-2013, 04:12 PM

redgunamo
08-29-2013, 04:13 PM

Classic Jorge
08-29-2013, 04:19 PM
Most of which you cant/wont answer

redgunamo
08-29-2013, 04:30 PM

Dorset Gooner
08-29-2013, 07:05 PM