I'm starting to give up on Suarez - they are steadfastly refusing to sell him to a rival and will

[Rich]

want parity with the Cavani deal. They just don't give a **** about having an unhappy player - they're far richer than us so can afford just to have him and not play him if necessary.

The question is now, can we make do with what we've got for next season and have another go at making a big signing in Jan/next summer?

[Classic Jorge]

[Berni]

[Dorset Gooner]

[Rich]

I think they'll just keep playing him regardless and I'm sure he'll perform otherwise clubs will lose interest.

Madrid could well have enough for him once the Higuain deal goes through and they would probably sell him to a club in another league for that much

I just wish we could have afforded/had the balls to do this to van Persie.

[Rich]

fan base.

[Classic Jorge]

[Classic Jorge]

[Bergkamp's Brain]

but you did hook won

[7evens]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21168666

[Red N White Army]

[Dorset Gooner]

west country cider head walks around in a stained liverpool shirt does not mean they are actively putting funds in their coffers.

[Rich]

£600million stadium to pay off.

As such, one could argue that they have more disposable income to be stubborn if they wish.

I think the case is more than they're not profressional enough. Arsenal would not conduct themselves like this and would sell the player to the highest bidder if he wanted out.

[Billy Goat Sverige]

[PSRB]

They're based in Liverpool for a start

[Ashberto]

claim is disproved suddenly it is all about costs.

[Rich]

still going to be professional and play to his potential.