FFP, good/ bad idea ?

[Norwegian Bastard]

I say bad, why ?
Well because it is based on point deduction penalty system.
I expect this to be upheld in a way that if you are very bad (city,united,chelsea,us)you will get something like 10 points deducted and if you are like Everton or newcastle who might just break the rules you will get something like 3 points taken off

So here is the league table if you use FFP from the start of this season

1. Man u 67p
2. City. 55
3. Spurs. 51
4. Everton 49
5. Chels. 48
6. Arsenal 46
7. WBA. 44
-----------------------
17. Sunder. 28
18. Villa. 24
19. Readi. 23
20.QPR. 14

This is based on the wage structure because the rule about loss of £105m
over 3years will be solved by owners making sponsor deals

So how the f..k does FFP change anything ?

[Free SL]

Well done

[Hillary]

[halfsharkalligatorhalfman]

[Hillary]

[Norwegian Bastard]

That fa will make sure top 5 is moved down the table or change their wage structure?
That players who see the new tv deal(the biggest ever)will say yes sir we are happy to cut our wage so that our beloved club can earn more money?

If fa do that it will not be long before all the stars will play somewhere else
And the premier league and english football will be just a memory

[Free SL]

I can see an argument for City and Chelsea, but fail to see why we (or Man United) do.

[Norwegian Bastard]

£52m first year £56m scond and £60m third year
And since ours was £124m in the calender year 2011
And united's was £153m

Numbers for 2012 not yet ready

Source
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/may/23/premier-leagu e-accounts-profit-debt (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/may/23/premier-league-accounts-profit-debt)